{"title":"Predicting compressive strength of AAC blocks through machine learning advancements","authors":"Ehsan Harirchian","doi":"10.20528/cjcrl.2024.02.003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20528/cjcrl.2024.02.003","url":null,"abstract":"Determining the strength properties of Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (AAC) through conventional compression experiments is both time-consuming and costly. Using sophisticated Machine Learning (ML) algorithms to forecast concrete compressive strength can expedite time-consuming experimental procedures and reduce expenses. In this study, four ML models were proposed, including Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Linear Regression (LR), and Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD). These models were developed to forecast the compressive strength of AAC blocks based on a dataset of 525 cubic samples. By comparing the results using different evaluation indices, the study analyzed each input variable’s relative importance and impact on the output. The findings revealed that the SVR model had the least error and is thus the most suitable for concrete compressive strength estimation. This approach results in cost savings on both specimens and laboratory tests. Out of the seven input factors, which encompass the proportions of water, cement, sand, lime, fly ash, aluminum powder, and gypsum, the proportions of cement and water content were pinpointed as the most crucial characteristics. In contrast, aluminum powder and gypsum displayed less prominent significance.","PeriodicalId":488560,"journal":{"name":"Challenge journal of concrete research letters","volume":"10 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141349150","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Effect of resin amount on the damping properties of polymer concrete","authors":"Arif Ulu","doi":"10.20528/cjcrl.2024.02.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20528/cjcrl.2024.02.002","url":null,"abstract":"In the construction and infrastructure sector, efforts are being made to find faster and more efficient materials. Polymer concrete (PC) challenges traditional concrete with its fast setting, durability and abrasion resistance. While studies on PC strength are abundant in the literature, studies on the effects of resin amount on damping capacity are fewer than mechanical performance. In this paper, the effect of resin proportion on damping capacity is investigated by modal tests. PC mixtures in the production with different resin proportions (11‒19%) were poured into molds of 10x25x500 mm, using aggregates of up to 3.15 mm in size. After 14 days, the natural frequency and damping ratios of the specimens up to 1000 Hz were determined in modal tests. While the damping ratio (DR) decreased in resin contents up to 17%, the results of the specimens with 19% resin ratio increased. However, when the products with the same resin ratio are analyzed, the random distribution of the aggregate affects the damping capacity. The main reason of negative correlation between resin amount and DR is the filler amount in the mixture. Because of the production consistency, fluidization of all the mixtures is prevented by adding fillers. Therefore, the impact of the resin amount on DR is limited or even negative. Besides that, to compare measurement results finite element method (FEM) analyzes are conducted. It can be said that the natural frequencies are not suited well especially in high frequency ranges due to frequency dependent properties (visco-elastic) of PC.","PeriodicalId":488560,"journal":{"name":"Challenge journal of concrete research letters","volume":"34 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141345590","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The impact of openings on ferrocement I-beams: a study on metallic and non-metallic mesh reinforcement","authors":"G. Hekal, A. Elshaboury, Y. B. I. Shaheen","doi":"10.20528/cjcrl.2024.02.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20528/cjcrl.2024.02.001","url":null,"abstract":"The primary objective of this investigation is to assess the influence of openings on the structural performance of ferrocement I-beams, incorporating diverse metallic and non-metallic mesh reinforcements. Sixteen beams underwent testing utilizing a four-point loading system until failure, categorized into four groups based on the type of mesh reinforcement. Each group comprised a control I-beam without openings and three additional beams featuring one, two, and three openings, respectively. To ensure consistent reinforcement weight, the four groups were reinforced with three layers of welded steel meshes, two layers of expanded metal meshes, two layers of Tensar meshes, and eight layers of Gavazzi meshes. Comparative analysis of the experimental outcomes was conducted with finite element models utilizing Abaqus. Therefore, there was good agreement between the experimental and numerical results. The findings showed that beams with no openings, one, and two openings reinforced with Gavazzi meshes had the highest ultimate load compared to other tested beams, while beams with three openings, those reinforced with expanded metal meshes had the greatest ultimate loads. Placing three openings in beams, with dimensions of 100×50 mm (two of these openings are approximately 10 cm apart from each edge while the third opening is located at mid-span), reduced the load-to-weight ratio by about 20.7%, 12.9%, 8.2%, and 23.8% for welded beams, expanded beams, Tensar beams, and Gavazzi beams, respectively, compared to the beams with no openings.","PeriodicalId":488560,"journal":{"name":"Challenge journal of concrete research letters","volume":"32 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141350077","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}