{"title":"Limitation of Socio-Economic Rights in the 2010 Kenyan Constitution: A Proposal for the Adoption of a Proportionality Approach in the Judicial Adjudication of Socio-Economic Rights Disputes","authors":"N. Orago","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2013/V16I5A2433","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2013/V16I5A2433","url":null,"abstract":"On 27 August 2010 Kenya adopted a transformative Constitution with the objective of fighting poverty and inequality as well as improving the standards of living of all people in Kenya. One of the mechanisms in the 2010 Constitution aimed at achieving this egalitarian transformation is the entrenchment of justiciable socio-economic rights (SERs), an integral part of the Bill of Rights. The entrenched SERs require the State to put in place a legislative, policy and programmatic framework to enhance the realisation of its constitutional obligations to respect, protect and fulfill these rights for all Kenyans. These SER obligations, just like any other fundamental human rights obligations, are, however, not absolute and are subject to legitimate limitation by the State. Two approaches have been used in international and comparative national law jurisprudence to limit SERs: the proportionality approach, using a general limitation clause that has found application in international and regional jurisprudence on the one hand; and the reasonableness approach, using internal limitations contained in the standard of progressive realisation, an approach that has found application in the SER jurisprudence of the South African Courts, on the other hand. This article proposes that if the entrenched SERs are to achieve their transformative objectives, Kenyan courts must adopt a proportionality approach in the judicial adjudication of SER disputes. This proposal is based on the reasoning that for the entrenched SERs to have a substantive positive impact on the lives of the Kenyan people, any measure by the government aimed at their limitation must be subjected to strict scrutiny by the courts, a form of scrutiny that can be achieved only by using the proportionality standard entrenched in the article 24 general limitation clause.","PeriodicalId":445989,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Constitutions & Constitutional Design (Topic)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129765210","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Concept, the Comprehensiveness and the Protection of Social Rights in Brazil and Some Characteristics of These Rights in South America","authors":"M. Figueiredo","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3205542","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205542","url":null,"abstract":"The Brazilian doctrine does not give a uniform treatment to form a concept of the social rights. The intent of this paper is to focus the comprehensiveness of the expression social rights in Brazil and comment some cases of Latin American States, including Brazil, regarding the justiciability of Human Rights’ Treaties. There are cases in which budgetary resources cannot be available to satisfy a right or condemnation, but the same can also imply for noncompliance with an obligation undertaken in economic, social and cultural rights matter. The adhesion by part of the Latin American states to the International Covenant of Social, Economic and Cultural rights and to the Protocol of San Salvador, implies a juridical-constitutional commitment with the duty of progressive realization of such rights and consequently, with the correlative prohibition of regression. The universal range of the economic, social and cultural rights will not be attained until the obstacles to the applicability of these rights are overcome. Budgetary planning is important for Executive and Legislative Powers to make social rights effective, but the role of the Judiciary Power to guarantee the existential minimum (survival level content) cannot be forgotten.","PeriodicalId":445989,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Constitutions & Constitutional Design (Topic)","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134031099","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Interpreting the Treaty -- Questions of Native Title, Territorial Government and Searching for Constitutional Histories","authors":"Mark Hickford","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2873865","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2873865","url":null,"abstract":"This essay deals with the various perspectives and interpretations of the Treaty of Waitangi over time. Drawn from a multi-author collection of essays in memory of the scholarship of the historian Ian Wards, the author argues that, whilst we must be mindful of not producing ‘treaty-centric’ histories, it is important not to reduce the historical interpretative complexities of the Treaty. Hickford continues by stating that one must be cautious when assuming the framers’ original intent deserves priority attention in interpretation. Instead we must look more deeply into the texts to embrace the nuances, complexities and frailties within them, including the ways in which they instantiated a number of interpretative communities. It is concluded that whilst the texts lived many lives of interpretation, argument and negotiation, their significance lies in their strength as texts, allowing them to become a lasting focus for political relations, and the development of constitutional histories (even as these material realities of indigenous and colonial co-existence were concealed or masked).","PeriodicalId":445989,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Constitutions & Constitutional Design (Topic)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117039926","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}