{"title":"The Hegemonic Influence of the United States in the Middle East Case Study: Israel's Security","authors":"Hamid Sarmadi, E. Hassanpour","doi":"10.15520/JASSH.V6I8.511","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15520/JASSH.V6I8.511","url":null,"abstract":"At the foreign policy level of hegemonic power in the post-Cold War international system, ideas play a pivotal role in justifying the goals of U.S. foreign policy as hegemonic power in the international system and, consequently, guide the country's performance on the universal stage. In this respect, US foreign policy during recent decades has been based on comprehensive support and absolute alignment with Israel's interests in the Middle East and at the level of the international system. This article aims at examining the hegemonic influence of the United States in the Middle East with a focus targeted at Israel's security. The most important legacy of US foreign policy over the Middle East has been Israel's strategic shift toward building security of Israel in the Middle East. On the other hand, unilateralism based on Israel's security has been at odds with security in the Middle East.","PeriodicalId":436070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Judicial System","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125755930","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Reasonable Person in Canon Law","authors":"Dr. Johnny M Sakr","doi":"10.22259/2637-5893.0501001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22259/2637-5893.0501001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":436070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Judicial System","volume":"540 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123274906","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A Critical Analysis of Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in Bench-People; the Case of \"Tomo\", South-West Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Teklemariam Yarinbab, Kassaye Muluneh","doi":"10.4172/2169-0170.1000240","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2169-0170.1000240","url":null,"abstract":"Customary dispute resolution mechanisms are the traditional practices used to resolve conflicts and maintain peace and stability in the community (1). Due to the multi-ethnic composition in Ethiopia, there is no uniform application of customary law all over the country. For instance, the institution of Gada system in Oromo, shimagalle in Amhara and the other ethnic groups has similarly adopted their dispute resolution systems based on their own values and norms (2).","PeriodicalId":436070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Judicial System","volume":"160 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123346093","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
