Leiden Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Insolvency of Significant Non-Financial Enterprises: Lessons from Bank Failures and Bank Resolution 重大非金融企业破产:银行倒闭与银行处置的经验教训
Leiden Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series Pub Date : 2020-05-24 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3609285
I. Kokorin
{"title":"Insolvency of Significant Non-Financial Enterprises: Lessons from Bank Failures and Bank Resolution","authors":"I. Kokorin","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3609285","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3609285","url":null,"abstract":"In the aftermath of the global financial crisis the EU bank resolution regime went through fundamental changes that seek to preserve financial stability and ensure continuity of critical functions. The same cannot be said of insolvency rules applicable to non-financial enterprises. Unlike bank resolution with its macroprudential and proactive focus, insolvency law has largely remained microprudential and reactive. Admittedly, unlike bank failures, corporate insolvencies usually do not pose systemic risk. However, in practice this may not hold true for significant non-financial enterprises (SNFEs). Such enterprises oftentimes play a major role in national economies and serve important public functions. Their failure may trigger contagion and cause disruptive consequences. Insofar as insolvency of SNFEs raises concerns common to bank failures, the question arises whether certain strategies and tools embraced within the EU bank recovery and resolution framework should be extended to regulate SNFE insolvency. This article explores the feasibility of such an extension.\u0000Bank resolution, insolvency, significant non-financial enterprises, enterprise groups, Carillion, early intervention, recovery and resolution planning, living wills, public interest, systemic risk, critical functions.","PeriodicalId":426443,"journal":{"name":"Leiden Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125149410","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Circumstantial Evidence, Adverse Inferences, and Findings of Corruption: Metal-Tech v. The Republic of Uzbekistan 间接证据,不利推论,和腐败的调查结果:金属科技诉乌兹别克斯坦共和国
Leiden Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series Pub Date : 2014-05-09 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.2435051
Cecily Rose
{"title":"Circumstantial Evidence, Adverse Inferences, and Findings of Corruption: Metal-Tech v. The Republic of Uzbekistan","authors":"Cecily Rose","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2435051","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2435051","url":null,"abstract":"In an October 2013 award, the ICSID tribunal in Metal-Tech v. Uzbekistan determined that it lacked jurisdiction over the dispute between the parties on account of Metal-Tech’s violations of Uzbek anti-bribery laws. The tribunal held that the existence of bribery in connection with the establishment of Metal-Tech’s investment in Uzbekistan in the late 1990s deprived it of jurisdiction under the applicable bilateral investment treaty (BIT), which requires investments to be implemented in accordance with the laws of the host State. This case represents a rare example of an ICSID tribunal declining to hear a dispute on account of findings of corruption. While allegations of corruption have arisen in many other ICSID cases, the World Duty Free v. Republic of Kenya case represents the only other instance in which findings of corruption by an ICSID tribunal have resulted in the tribunal’s dismissal of the claims. The tribunal’s decision in Metal-Tech v. Uzbekistan is also notable for its especially thorough examination of circumstantial evidence, on which it relied heavily in concluding that bribery had taken place.","PeriodicalId":426443,"journal":{"name":"Leiden Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133247153","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
New IMF Initiative Revives Old Inter-Creditor Issues 国际货币基金组织的新倡议重新引发了旧的债权人间问题
Leiden Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series Pub Date : 2013-06-30 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.2287641
Yanying Li
{"title":"New IMF Initiative Revives Old Inter-Creditor Issues","authors":"Yanying Li","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2287641","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2287641","url":null,"abstract":"In 2003, the IMF abandoned its proposal for a treaty-based framework to restructure sovereign debt. Triggered by lessons from the Greek debt restructuring and Argentine bondholder litigation, the IMF revisited potential reforms of sovereign debt restructuring in May 2013. This paper introduces the revisit and analyses various inter-creditor issues involved.","PeriodicalId":426443,"journal":{"name":"Leiden Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series","volume":"164 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123366076","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Playing Sovereign Debt Creditors’ Orchestra: Inter-Creditor Issues in Sovereign Debt Restructuring 演奏主权债务债权人的管弦乐队:主权债务重组中的债权人间问题
Leiden Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series Pub Date : 2013-01-15 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.2200306
Yanying Li
{"title":"Playing Sovereign Debt Creditors’ Orchestra: Inter-Creditor Issues in Sovereign Debt Restructuring","authors":"Yanying Li","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2200306","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2200306","url":null,"abstract":"Lack of support for the Sovereign Debt Restructuring Mechanism (SDRM) discussion at the IMF a decade ago has encouraged several debt NGOs to actively advance proposals for sovereign debt arbitration - a bankruptcy-type arbitral tribunal to handle sovereign debt disputes in a collective manner. In response to these proposals, the Government of the Netherlands and the Permanent Court of Arbitration recently initiated a project to investigate the desirability and feasibility of sovereign debt arbitration. The interim project report flags, among other issues, the absence of agreed principles that would be applied by the arbitral tribunal. This paper wishes to contribute to the discussion surrounding such principles by addressing inter-creditor issues in sovereign debt restructuring. It begins with an explanation of inter-creditor issues at the time of crisis, and the urgent need for better creditor coordination looking at the Argentine bondholders’ recent success in the Abaclat and NML Capital cases. It draws from the experience of domestic bankruptcy law to explore the best solution for resolving inter-creditor issues in the sovereign debt context. Importantly, this paper challenges the fundamental theory of collectivity in bankruptcy law, arguing that the approach used in most domestic bankruptcy systems to address inter-creditor issues — the inclusion of all claims in a collective proceeding that ensures equitable treatment among all creditors - should be applied differently in the sovereign debt world due to the difference of the debtor being a State.","PeriodicalId":426443,"journal":{"name":"Leiden Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132080716","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Justice in EU Cooperation and Development Policy 欧盟合作与发展政策中的正义
Leiden Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series Pub Date : 2012-06-19 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2958167
C. Stahn, Dov Jacobs
{"title":"Justice in EU Cooperation and Development Policy","authors":"C. Stahn, Dov Jacobs","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2958167","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2958167","url":null,"abstract":"The concept of justice is essential in this context of human development as well as in the context of cooperation. It plays a central role in the context of ‘human rights, democracy’ and ‘good governance’ which form core foundations of EU development cooperation. This study clarifies the use of the concept in EU cooperation and development practice, and possible strategies for future policies. First, it determines the content and meaning of the notion of ‘justice’, taking into account justice theories and their application in the international context. Second, it examines how the concept is applied in both internal and external European policy, especially in the framework of development and/or to justice. Following these findings, the study examines ‘justice’ strategies in the context of multilateral relationships and in the context of European external programmes, as well as peace-building and transitional justice. It concludes with a set of targeted recommendations.","PeriodicalId":426443,"journal":{"name":"Leiden Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133278959","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What Is Data Mining and How Does It Work? 什么是数据挖掘,它是如何工作的?
Leiden Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-30487-3_2
T. Calders, B. Custers
{"title":"What Is Data Mining and How Does It Work?","authors":"T. Calders, B. Custers","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-30487-3_2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30487-3_2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":426443,"journal":{"name":"Leiden Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116166483","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信