Austin Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Radiotherapy最新文献

{"title":"A Case Series of Dosimetric Comparison-VMAT (RapidArc), IMRT, 3DCRT for Extended Field Radiotherapy in Cervical Cancer","authors":"P. Marimuthu, Sasipriya Ponniah, G. Ganesan, P. Ramamoorthy, Brindha Thangaraj, Venkatraman Pitchaikann","doi":"10.26420/austinjnuclmedradiother.2021.1028","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26420/austinjnuclmedradiother.2021.1028","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To compare plans of 3DCRT, IMRT and VMAT (RapidArc) and evaluate them in different dosimetric aspects along with dose to organs at risk with each technique to determine the best treatment technique for Extended field RT in cervical cancer patients Material & Methods: We evaluated External Beam radiotherapy plans of 10 patients of FIGO 2018 stage rIIIC2 who received Extended Field Radiotherapy (EFRT) to primary site along with regional nodes-bilateral external, internal iliac lymph nodes, presacral and para-aortic lymph nodes. The dose prescribed for all patients was 50.4Gy/28 fractions at 180cGy/fraction. Few patients had received gross nodal boost following this, but for better comparison only the initial phase of 50.4Gy/28 fractions was considered. All patients were planned with 3DCRT, IMRT and RapidArc. We evaluated and compared these plans dosimetrically in terms of Homogeneity Index, Conformity Index, Target Volume Coverage, Gradient Index, Unified Dosimetry Index, Integral dose, Monitor units and Doses to Organs at risk such as Anorectum, Bladder, Bowel Bag, Bilateral Femoral Heads, Bilateral Kidneys and Bone Marrow. Results: Intensity modulated techniques RapidArc and IMRT significantly spared critical organs compared to 3DCRT. Between RapidArc and IMRT, the critical organ sparing was comparable, but RapidArc had better target coverage, lesser MU and lesser treatment time. All techniques had acceptable HI, CI, GI, UDI and whole body Integral dose. Conclusion: Intensity modulated techniques should be the standard for EFRT in cervical cancer. Both RapidArc and IMRT are acceptable techniques of treatment delivery although the former may be preferred if and when available.","PeriodicalId":424846,"journal":{"name":"Austin Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Radiotherapy","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128902081","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Low-Dose Radiation Therapy to Treat COVID-19: Results of the First Phase of Clinical Trials","authors":"G. H","doi":"10.26420/austinjnuclmedradiother.2021.1027","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26420/austinjnuclmedradiother.2021.1027","url":null,"abstract":"Using low-dose radiation therapy (LDRT) to treat inflammation, pneumonia, and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been investigated. Results have revealed that LDRT can improve inflammation in different line cells, animals, and humans. It was demonstrated that LDRT with a single dose (0.3-1 Gy) to the lungs could treat pneumonia resulting from COVID-19 by avoiding normal tissue toxicities. These suggested values of doses are obtained from the historical use of ionizing radiation for pneumonia [1]. A clinical study recently treated five patients with COVID-19 in the age range of 64-96 years; the lungs of these patients were exposed to 1.5 Gy of radiation in one fraction. Results showed that their respiratory conditions were quickly improved in four patients in the first 24 hours of exposure. The results of blood tests and imaging also confirmed the positive effect of LDRT on COVID-19 treatment [2]. Short course results of another study carried out on five patients with COVID-19 aged over 60 years, who underwent national COVID-19 therapy protocols, showed that using 0.5 Gy of radiation in one fraction led to the improvement of four patients in the first few days after exposure. Apart from that, they were discharged from the hospital with an average of 6 days, and no radiation toxicity was observed in them [3]. Another clinical investigation has used LDRT on nine patients to treat COVID-19. In this study, patients received 1 Gy to total lungs, and the SatO2/FiO2 index of these patients was evaluated. Results showed that this index significantly improved 72 hours and one week after LDRT, and inflammation of the lungs decreased one week after radiation therapy. Compared to patients who did not receive LDRT, the median days of hospitalization of patients who received LDRT was reduced by approximately one-fifth. Among these patients, seven were discharged, and two patients died [4]. The incidence of cancers such as lung, esophagus, and breast is one of the controversial subjects surrounding the use of LDRT in COVID-19 treatment. According to the Biological Effects of Ionization Radiation VII (BEIR VII) model, the risk of lung cancer was estimated for patients with COVID-19 whose lungs were irradiated to 0.5 Gy. The incidence of lung cancer can increase by 0.84% and 2.3% for males and females aged above 60 years, respectively. On the other hand, for young patients aged 25 years, the incidence of lung cancer was estimated at 1.1% and 3% for males and females, respectively [5]. According to this model, with an increase in the dose received by the lungs, the risk of lung cancer increases linearly; therefore, the incidence of lung cancer for patients whose whole lung receives a dose of 1.5 Gy will be three times for those who have received a dose of 0.5 Gy [6]. Based on these results, exposure of the lungs to the dose in the range 0.5-1.5 Gy can increase the risk of lung cancer up to 9% and 7% for female patients and 3.3% and 2.5% for male patients aged ","PeriodicalId":424846,"journal":{"name":"Austin Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Radiotherapy","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123084625","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Role of 18F-FDG PET-CT in CNS Lymphoma-A Case Report","authors":"Zohra Ft, J. Hosen, Hartenberg Ma, Sharmin Ra, Ahasan Mm, Sarker Ak","doi":"10.26420/austinjnuclmedradiother.2021.1026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26420/austinjnuclmedradiother.2021.1026","url":null,"abstract":"The actual role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in evaluating primary brain lymphoma is still an open issue. Brain lymphoma usually show elevated 18F-FDG uptake, often higher than other brain tumors or inflammatory processes, but the metabolic behavior of this lymphoma is not still understood. Central nervous system lymphoma is a rare non-Hodgkin lymphoma in which malignant (cancer) cells from lymph tissue form in the brain and/or spinal cord (primary CNS) or spread from other parts of the body to the brain and/or spinal cord (secondary CNS).A 55 year-old man presented with headache. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) revealed a well-enhanced mass lesion in the left frontal lobe. A surgical specimen obtained through left orbito-pterional craniotomy revealed a Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL). 18F FDG PET-CT scan showed multiple hypodensehypermetabolic lesions in brain. Multiple hypodense focal hypermetabolic areas were seen in right frontal lobe, left frontal lobe and left temporal lobe. There was also a subcentimetrichypermetabolic sub-carinal lymph node. The activity was diminished on follow-up PET-CT after 8 courses of chemotherapy. This case indicates that FDG PET-CT scan can aid identify the atypical primary CNS lymphoma for staging workup and can be a useful tool to see treatment response.","PeriodicalId":424846,"journal":{"name":"Austin Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Radiotherapy","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132849494","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Clinical Investigations of Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Combined with Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy for Patients with Spinal Metastases","authors":"Chen X, Xie Xq, Li Wm, Liao Zy, Wu Db, Wang F","doi":"10.26420/AUSTINJNUCLMEDRADIOTHER.2021.1025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26420/AUSTINJNUCLMEDRADIOTHER.2021.1025","url":null,"abstract":"Percutaneous Vertebroplasty (PVP) or radiotherapy are used in tumor with bone metastasis. However, The treatment of vertebral metastasis tumor with PVP combined with Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) are rarely reported. The effectiveness and feasibility of these treatment procedures are initially observed in the article. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical features of 7 patients with vertebral metastases. They all received PVP, and then IMRT (6 MV-X linear at a dose of 40-60Gy). Technical success of PVP was achieved in all patients, and all of them completed the radiotherapy plan successfully. There are no severe complications were observed. They all got pain relief and no pain or fracture were found after PVP combined with IMRT. PVP combined with IMRT seems to be an effective and feasible means to improve the quality of life of patients with tumor vertebral metastasis.","PeriodicalId":424846,"journal":{"name":"Austin Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Radiotherapy","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127666133","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}