2012 CAAA Annual Conference (Archive)最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
A Comparison of Four Learning Outcomes between Two Types of Media Delivery in Managerial Accounting Course 管理会计课程中两种媒介传递方式四种学习效果的比较
2012 CAAA Annual Conference (Archive) Pub Date : 2012-01-11 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1983567
Ibrahim M. Aly
{"title":"A Comparison of Four Learning Outcomes between Two Types of Media Delivery in Managerial Accounting Course","authors":"Ibrahim M. Aly","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1983567","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1983567","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this empirical research study is to compare students’ performances in an online setting versus a hybrid classroom-online setting in an introductory managerial accounting course. The research question is whether there is a significant difference in the learning outcomes, which occurs in these two different settings. The methodology used in this study includes scores from 12 weekly online assignments, two major online exams, and a final examination held on campus. The data collected represents three classes taught in the fall semester of 2010 (two hybrid classrooms and one online) and two classes taught in the summer 2011 (one hybrid classroom and one online). The results presented in this study only based on performances of students who completed the course. Results reveal that there were no significant differences in the performances of students in the online section setting relative to those in the hybrid setting.","PeriodicalId":416796,"journal":{"name":"2012 CAAA Annual Conference (Archive)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128513366","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is Joint Audit Bad or Good? Efficiency Perspective Evidence from Three European Countries 联合审计是好是坏?三个欧洲国家的效率视角证据
2012 CAAA Annual Conference (Archive) Pub Date : 2011-11-28 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1982732
C. Lesage, Nicole V. S. Ratzinger‐Sakel, J. Kettunen
{"title":"Is Joint Audit Bad or Good? Efficiency Perspective Evidence from Three European Countries","authors":"C. Lesage, Nicole V. S. Ratzinger‐Sakel, J. Kettunen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1982732","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1982732","url":null,"abstract":"There is a constant questioning about the interest of introducing the joint audit. Very recently, the European Commission has raised this topic in its Green Paper, arguing that it may be a way to increase audit quality after the financial crisis and to mitigate audit market concentration, by enlarging the audit offer. However, the joint audit also faces strong resistance, consisting mainly in arguing an unbearable additional cost. This work tries to participate to the current debate by providing evidence based on the new institutional economics criteria of efficiency (i.e. cost or quality) that is relevant to justify an institutional mechanisms change. We run our main analysis on the Danish context (2005-2009), which gave up the mandatory joint audit in 2005. This change in regulation therefore provides a unique natural field to study the impact of joint audit within the same institutional setting. We test the impact of joint audit on both audit costs proxied by audit fees or total fees and audit quality proxied by abnormal accruals. Our results confirm the non significance of the association between total fees and joint audit, and between abnormal accrual and joint audit. We evidence a positive and significant relationship between audit fees and joint audit. Then we run an additional study on a matched French-German sample to capture the impact of a mandatory joint audit. France is characterized by a long tradition of joint audit while Germany has always experienced a single audit system. This additional analysis confirms the main result analysis. The results are of interest for regulators and actors in the audit market.","PeriodicalId":416796,"journal":{"name":"2012 CAAA Annual Conference (Archive)","volume":"169 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133258594","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信