{"title":"Legal Frameworks of Adoption in Pakistan: A Comparative Study of Child Welfare and Parental Rights","authors":"Kinza Malik, Tansif Ur Rehman","doi":"10.59075/p89e2925","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.59075/p89e2925","url":null,"abstract":"The paper will explore the legal provisions under which adoption works in Pakistan with reference to the nature of child welfare and parental rights in a practical sense. Compared with the plain-and-simple adoption system that you would find in a Western legal system, the traditions of Pakistan are not only deeply embedded with Islamic ideology but also enshrined in guardianship legislation such as the Guardians and Wards Act of 1890. The paper considers how these laws attempt to consider the best interests of the child whilst still preserving the rights of biological lineage and the birth parents in accordance with Shariah requirements. It further compares it side by side with the international standards, indicating the key differences in legal recognition, the permanence of parental rights, and the child protection mechanisms. Taking a comparative lens, it unveils loopholes in the existing system and proposes changes that would put child welfare on its feet without undermining religious and cultural values. Comprehensively, the results have indicated that the current legal framework requires a more systematic approach to strike the right balance between the entitlement of adoptive parents, the biological family, and the welfare of the child.","PeriodicalId":41571,"journal":{"name":"Review of Korean Studies","volume":"3 3","pages":"3122-3131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://thecrsss.com/index.php/Journal/article/download/1007/1013","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147919940","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mehreen Yaseen, Sabahat Ali Sheikh, Ghulam Hussain Abid Sipra, Musa Khan, Sadaf Ghayoor
{"title":"False Flag or Faulty Intelligence? A Diplomatic Analysis of India's Accusations Against Pakistan After the 2025 Pahalgam Attack","authors":"Mehreen Yaseen, Sabahat Ali Sheikh, Ghulam Hussain Abid Sipra, Musa Khan, Sadaf Ghayoor","doi":"10.59075/dt86pn97","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.59075/dt86pn97","url":null,"abstract":"The 2025 Pahalgam incident, which killed 26 people including 25 tourists, ignited fears of renewed India-Pakistan tensions. Within hours, Indian media accused Pakistan of orchestrating the attack without credible evidence or forensic proof. This paper examines whether India’s diplomatic and media response was based on hard intelligence or driven by political motives. Indian mainstream and digital media quickly blamed Pakistani-backed militant groups, fueling a narrative of “cross-border terrorism” before any official investigation. This narrative laid the groundwork for Operation Sindoor, an overnight airstrike on alleged militant camps across the LOC, which Indian officials claimed was a “decisive message” to Pakistan. However, independent verification of targets or casualties was lacking. The timing coincided with domestic instability in India, raising questions about whether the operation aimed to deflect from mounting disaffection in Jammu and Kashmir and declining faith in security measures ahead of state elections. Meanwhile, Pakistan denied involvement, condemned the attack as terrorism, and demanded a joint or third-party investigation under the UN or a neutral body. Islamabad also reached out to China, Turkey, and OIC members, criticizing Indian media’s role in stoking tensions without proof. This study investigates the objectivity of India’s claims, analyzes diplomatic reactions from regional neighbors and global powers, and considers the implications of unsubstantiated accusations for regional stability and prospects for peace in South Asia.","PeriodicalId":41571,"journal":{"name":"Review of Korean Studies","volume":"3 3","pages":"48-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://thecrsss.com/index.php/Journal/article/download/664/690","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147907401","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"India’s Strategic Posture Under Modi: Continuity or Change? Implications for Pakistan’s Security and Regional Stability","authors":"Abbas Ali, Jawad Arshad, Hasnain Khan","doi":"10.59075/ebq13a67","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.59075/ebq13a67","url":null,"abstract":"This study critically examines the transformation of India’s strategic and nuclear posture under Prime Minister Narendra Modi, highlighting its destabilizing effects on South Asia’s deterrence equilibrium and the evolving trilateral dynamics with Pakistan and China. Through a qualitative interpretivist approach, integrating documentary analysis, discourse analysis, and deterrence theory, the research traces India’s doctrinal shift from credible minimum deterrence to a more assertive, flexible posture, characterized by Cold Start operationalization, ambiguity surrounding No First Use, and rapid force modernization including S-400 systems, hypersonic weapons, and deepened U.S. defense ties via LEMOA, COMCASA, and BECA. Pakistan’s response, grounded in Full Spectrum Deterrence and lowered nuclear thresholds, underscores a growing security dilemma, while China’s expanding strategic presence through CPEC, LAC tensions, and Indo-Pacific competition forces India to navigate a complex two-front scenario. The study argues that without urgent arms control, crisis management frameworks, and regional dialogue, this triadic configuration risks inadvertent escalation, miscalculation, and long-term strategic instability in one of the world’s most volatile nuclear theatres.","PeriodicalId":41571,"journal":{"name":"Review of Korean Studies","volume":"3 2","pages":"2350-2359"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147882071","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Okri, Ben","authors":"Lindsey B. Green-Simms","doi":"10.1002/9781119076506.wbeps280","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119076506.wbeps280","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Ben Okri (OBE), born on March 15, 1959 in Minna, central Nigeria, is a novelist, poet, and essayist known for his “magical realist” style. Okri published his first novel, Flowers and Shadows (1980) at the age of 21 and is most famous for his Booker Prize‐winning novel The Famished Road (1991), which focuses on a spirit child (or abiku ) who shuffles back and forth between the world of the living and the world of the dead.","PeriodicalId":41571,"journal":{"name":"Review of Korean Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147890029","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Walcott, Derek","authors":"Laurence A. Breiner","doi":"10.1002/9781119076506.wbeps376","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119076506.wbeps376","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Nobel Laureate Derek Walcott is the most prominent poet and playwright of the English‐speaking Caribbean. Born in St. Lucia in 1930, his work has reflected the full trajectory of colonialism and its aftermath. He is more an uncompromising observer than a participant in explicit politics, and his governing concern has been the writer's responsibility to his people, his place, and his languages, all of which he has celebrated in a long career.","PeriodicalId":41571,"journal":{"name":"Review of Korean Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147892621","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}