The American Court System最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
The Death of the Fourth Amendment Under the Rehnquist Court: Where is Original Intent When we Need it? 第四修正案在伦奎斯特法院的死亡:当我们需要它的时候,初衷在哪里?
The American Court System Pub Date : 2020-10-28 DOI: 10.1080/0735648X.1994.9721507
J. Davey
{"title":"The Death of the Fourth Amendment Under the Rehnquist Court: Where is Original Intent When we Need it?","authors":"J. Davey","doi":"10.1080/0735648X.1994.9721507","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.1994.9721507","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The U.S. Supreme Court has significantly modified the meaning of the Fourth Amendment over the past two decades. Numerous police practices that very often have developed as part of the “war-on-drugs” have been ruled to be acceptable. The framers of the Fourth Amendment required a showing of “probable cause” before a search or seizure could be undertaken by police. While it is true that some exceptions to the requirement of “probable cause” had been allowed by the Supreme Court prior to Burger's appointment as Chief Justice, these exceptions were very carefully limited and supported by specific public policy rationales. The Court under Burger and Rehnquist have added so many exceptions to the requirement of probable cause that there are few restrictions on police searches and seizures under the present interpretation of the Fourth Amendment. This paper will argue that the “war-on-drugs” is far more likely to destroy the Fourth Amendment than it is to destroy the drug problem and Congress or State ...","PeriodicalId":415563,"journal":{"name":"The American Court System","volume":"142 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134106262","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Commentary 评论
The American Court System Pub Date : 2020-10-28 DOI: 10.4324/9781315051482-15
E. van den Haag
{"title":"Commentary","authors":"E. van den Haag","doi":"10.4324/9781315051482-15","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315051482-15","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":415563,"journal":{"name":"The American Court System","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122204967","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Contemporary Look at the Effects of Rape Law Reform: How Far Have we Really Come?* 当代审视强奸法改革的影响:我们到底走了多远?*
The American Court System Pub Date : 2020-10-28 DOI: 10.4324/9781315051482-3
R. Bachman, R. Paternoster
{"title":"A Contemporary Look at the Effects of Rape Law Reform: How Far Have we Really Come?*","authors":"R. Bachman, R. Paternoster","doi":"10.4324/9781315051482-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315051482-3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":415563,"journal":{"name":"The American Court System","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116637696","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Should Penal Rehabilitationism be Revived? 刑罚改造应该复兴吗?
The American Court System Pub Date : 2020-10-28 DOI: 10.4324/9781315051482-16
Andrew von Hirsch, L. Maher
{"title":"Should Penal Rehabilitationism be Revived?","authors":"Andrew von Hirsch, L. Maher","doi":"10.4324/9781315051482-16","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315051482-16","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":415563,"journal":{"name":"The American Court System","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123511376","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Hands-Off, Hands-On, Hands-Semi-Off: A Discussion of the Current Legal Test Used by the United States Supreme Court to Decide Inmates' Rights 不干涉,直接干涉,半干涉:美国最高法院判定囚犯权利的现行法律标准讨论
The American Court System Pub Date : 2020-10-28 DOI: 10.4324/9781315051482-2
R. Alexander
{"title":"Hands-Off, Hands-On, Hands-Semi-Off: A Discussion of the Current Legal Test Used by the United States Supreme Court to Decide Inmates' Rights","authors":"R. Alexander","doi":"10.4324/9781315051482-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315051482-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":415563,"journal":{"name":"The American Court System","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124985841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Gender, Crime, And the Criminal Law Defenses 性别、犯罪与刑法辩护
The American Court System Pub Date : 1994-12-31 DOI: 10.2307/1144115
D. Denno
{"title":"Gender, Crime, And the Criminal Law Defenses","authors":"D. Denno","doi":"10.2307/1144115","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1144115","url":null,"abstract":"Gender is one of the strongest predictors of crime, particularly violent crime. Arrest, self report, and victimization data consistently show that men and boys commit significantly more crime, both serious and not, than women and girls. In addition evidence from the Biosocial Study - one of the country’s largest longitudinal studies of biological, psychological, and sociological predictors of crime - shows that different factors are predictive of crime among females than males. With some exceptions, biological factors were found to be more predictive of crime among females, whereas environmental factors were found to be more predictive of crime among males. These differences between the sexes raise the question of whether the criminal justice system should recognize a gender-based standard for either punishments or defenses. After a detailed look at the results of the Biosocial Study and examination of current gender-based defenses, both biological and cultural, the author concludes that criminal defenses and sentencing should be gender neutral. A policy of specific deterrence based on generalizations about immutable individual characteristics, such as gender, offends society’s notions of justice and promotes faulty stereotypes.","PeriodicalId":415563,"journal":{"name":"The American Court System","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1994-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114714964","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27
Race and Imprisonment Decisions 种族和监禁判决
The American Court System Pub Date : 1993-05-01 DOI: 10.1111/J.1533-8525.1993.TB00395.X
J. Kramer, Darrell Steffensmeir
{"title":"Race and Imprisonment Decisions","authors":"J. Kramer, Darrell Steffensmeir","doi":"10.1111/J.1533-8525.1993.TB00395.X","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1533-8525.1993.TB00395.X","url":null,"abstract":"The possible race differences in judicial sentencing have been of long-standing interest to social scientists. We argue, however, that prior research on the issue either uses crude measures of offe...","PeriodicalId":415563,"journal":{"name":"The American Court System","volume":"406 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1993-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131692929","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 55
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信