Discursive Turns and Critical Junctures最新文献

The deliberative qualities of the debates from a comparative perspective 从比较的角度看辩论的商议性

Discursive Turns and Critical Junctures Pub Date : 2020-06-18 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190097431.003.0004

D. Porta, Pietro Castelli Gattinara, K. Eleftheriadis, Andrea Felicetti

引用次数: 0

Discursive Turns and Critical Junctures Pub Date : 2020-06-18 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190097431.003.0007

D. Porta, Pietro Castelli Gattinara, K. Eleftheriadis, Andrea Felicetti

{"title":"Religious organizations","authors":"D. Porta, Pietro Castelli Gattinara, K. Eleftheriadis, Andrea Felicetti","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190097431.003.0007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190097431.003.0007","url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 7 addresses the discourses by religious groups, including Christian (both Catholic and Protestant), Jewish, and Muslim actors. An important but often neglected part of those debates took place between mainstream actors and religious organizations but also among religious organizations themselves. These debates were embedded within distinct frameworks of institutional and political opportunities, especially concerning the place of religion in society and the importance of religion in understanding national identity that differed greatly among the countries under study. These factors, in turn, influenced the recognition of religious actors as legitimate partners in the public debates as well as the attention paid to their views and the frames used for their understanding (from the French laïcité to the British multiculturalist model). In all cases, however, religious organizations sought to mobilize available resources and take into account discursive opportunities to reach audiences within and outside their respective religious spheres, and to express their views on a variety of issues ranging from radicalism to peaceful coexistence, from inter-religious affairs to national identity, from Islamophobia and anti-Semitism to integration.","PeriodicalId":413307,"journal":{"name":"Discursive Turns and Critical Junctures","volume":"353 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122850326","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Left-wing movements facing dilemmas 左翼运动面临困境

Discursive Turns and Critical Junctures Pub Date : 2020-06-18 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190097431.003.0005

D. Porta, Pietro Castelli Gattinara, K. Eleftheriadis, Andrea Felicetti

引用次数: 0

The evolution of the debate 辩论的演变

Discursive Turns and Critical Junctures Pub Date : 2020-06-18 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190097431.003.0003

D. Porta, Pietro Castelli Gattinara, K. Eleftheriadis, Andrea Felicetti

引用次数: 0

Comparing mass media debates in the European public sphere 比较欧洲公共领域的大众媒体辩论

Discursive Turns and Critical Junctures Pub Date : 2020-06-18 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190097431.003.0002

D. Porta, Pietro Castelli Gattinara, K. Eleftheriadis, Andrea Felicetti

{"title":"Comparing mass media debates in the European public sphere","authors":"D. Porta, Pietro Castelli Gattinara, K. Eleftheriadis, Andrea Felicetti","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190097431.003.0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190097431.003.0002","url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this chapter is to provide background information about the political context in which the debate on the Charlie Hebdo attacks developed within the different national arenas. Besides some general political trends developing at the European level (including the financial crisis and its political consequences), Chapter 2 presents the main dimensions of political opportunities and constraints that are susceptible to explain cross-national differences in collective actors’ claiming, framing, and justifying. In particular, it zooms in on two sets of dimensions that social movement studies have considered relevant: factors that can influence public debates over migration and ethnic relations in general—i.e., national citizenship regimes—and factors which pertain more specifically to debates about Muslims and Islam in the secular public sphere—i.e., the regime addressing Church–State relations. The chapter then presents a quantitative empirical analysis of political claims-making in France, Italy, Germany, and the United Kingdom, during the first month following the 2015 attacks. Despite substantial cross-national differences in terms of discursive and political opportunities, the analysis of the content of the debate in the European public sphere shows that most of the mass media attention was devoted to the issues of security and freedom of expression (highly visible and non-divisive issues), which triggered much less political conflict than stories about Islam, discrimination, and migration.","PeriodicalId":413307,"journal":{"name":"Discursive Turns and Critical Junctures","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128616381","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Multiculturalism backlash and anti-establishment politics 多元文化主义的反弹和反建制政治

Discursive Turns and Critical Junctures Pub Date : 2020-06-18 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190097431.003.0006

D. Porta, Pietro Castelli Gattinara, K. Eleftheriadis, Andrea Felicetti

引用次数: 0

Justifications in the debate on citizenship 公民权辩论的理由

Discursive Turns and Critical Junctures Pub Date : 2020-06-18 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190097431.003.0008

D. Porta, Pietro Castelli Gattinara, K. Eleftheriadis, Andrea Felicetti

{"title":"Justifications in the debate on citizenship","authors":"D. Porta, Pietro Castelli Gattinara, K. Eleftheriadis, Andrea Felicetti","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190097431.003.0008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190097431.003.0008","url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 8 is devoted to an analysis of the justifications used by the different actors in debating the Charlie Hebdo attacks. In particular, it looks at the ways in which participants in the public debates use justifications for their claims, which become all the more relevant in “critical moments.” Referring to the “imperative to justify,” the chapter analyzes the moral principles referred to in the everyday debate. Among religious organizations, justifications refer to communitarian versus cosmopolitan views, freedom entering in tension with offenses against religion (blasphemy), and liberty with claims about security. Ecumenical arguments are also countered by claims about the superiority of one’s own religion. With regard to the justifications in the radical right, the Charlie Hebdo attacks gave more leverage to a justification based to a certain extent on civic values—such as defending freedom—but strongly bridged within justifications coming from the traditional world of worthiness. In general, the left addresses the Charlie Hebdo attacks with some difficulty, with tensions between a traditionally inclusive position toward migrants and minorities and the defense of freedom—which is perceived as a collective, rather than individual, right.","PeriodicalId":413307,"journal":{"name":"Discursive Turns and Critical Junctures","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125700565","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Discursive turns and critical junctures 话语转折和关键时刻

Discursive Turns and Critical Junctures Pub Date : 2020-05-07 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190097431.003.0001

D. Porta, Pietro Castelli Gattinara, K. Eleftheriadis, Andrea Felicetti

{"title":"Discursive turns and critical junctures","authors":"D. Porta, Pietro Castelli Gattinara, K. Eleftheriadis, Andrea Felicetti","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190097431.003.0001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190097431.003.0001","url":null,"abstract":"The introductory chapter presents the theoretical framework of the research, its empirical design and the content of the volume. Our analysis of the Charlie Hebdo attacks addresses in particular the claims, frames, and justifications that civil society actors introduce in multiple public spheres. We want to understand both the content and the forms of these interventions by considering the appropriation of existing discursive opportunities by collective actors, but also their embeddedness within strategies of resource mobilization. Locating our research within social movement studies, we point at the cultural dynamics during discursive critical junctures, showing the ways in which different actors address transformative events which challenge their visions. As a “transformative event” the attacks point at the capacity of action itself to produce contextual opportunities and organizational resources that are mobilized in the strategic interactions of various actors. In this chapter, we first reflect on the concept of transformative events as triggering critical junctures, defined as moments in which changes happen suddenly rather than incrementally (as well as subsequent choice points), and on the very conceptions of citizenship that are affected by them. We then move to a discussion of the forms that debates might take in the public sphere (referring in particular to the concept of deliberation). After that, we present our analytic model, followed by a justification of the research design and the methodological choices. The chapter ends with a presentation of the volume.","PeriodicalId":413307,"journal":{"name":"Discursive Turns and Critical Junctures","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116701134","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4