PSN: Conflict & Electoral Politics (Topic)最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Electoral Violence and Securities Market Responses During the 2013 Pakistan General Election: Political Risk Metrics for the Rest of Us 2013年巴基斯坦大选期间的选举暴力和证券市场反应:我们其他人的政治风险指标
PSN: Conflict & Electoral Politics (Topic) Pub Date : 2015-10-10 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2680351
Allan Dwyer, M. Anees
{"title":"Electoral Violence and Securities Market Responses During the 2013 Pakistan General Election: Political Risk Metrics for the Rest of Us","authors":"Allan Dwyer, M. Anees","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2680351","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2680351","url":null,"abstract":"The efficient-market hypothesis holds that securities markets are efficient, fair and instantaneous in their treatment of material information flows. The reality may be somewhat messier in the emerging traded asset markets of the Global South. Emerging markets, notably Pakistan, present particularly esoteric market information systems. In general, stock and corporate bond market actors gauge future corporate profits and sell assets when negative news announcements threaten future earnings. For their part, sovereign bonds sell off when the overall economic conditions of the national issuer appear to be threatened. Together, stock and bond markets amount to a massive crowd-sourcing mechanism for assessing and acting on political risk. Both academicians and policy practitioners have yet to fully appreciate the risk-assessment function played by markets. This paper will assess financial market responses to reports of electoral violence during the important 2013 general election in Pakistan. The election is used herein as an event study to assess how stock and bond traders responded to confirmed acts of political violence during and just after the campaign. Insights into both the theoretical efficacy of the efficient-market construct, as well as the particularities of Pakistan at this point in its long democratic journey, will be assessed.","PeriodicalId":408323,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Conflict & Electoral Politics (Topic)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128475372","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信