ERN: Governmentally Owned Firms (Topic)最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
An Identity in Disarray: The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s Government-Agency Status 混乱中的身份:联邦存款保险公司的政府机构地位
ERN: Governmentally Owned Firms (Topic) Pub Date : 2010-11-29 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.1717247
Adam Shajnfeld
{"title":"An Identity in Disarray: The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s Government-Agency Status","authors":"Adam Shajnfeld","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1717247","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1717247","url":null,"abstract":"In the last three years, the world has experienced one of the worst banking catastrophes in its history. In the United States alone, some 282 banks have failed since January 2008. This burgeoning devastation has catapulted the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) to the forefront of crisis-management as it acts as receiver for each of these failed institutions. With high stakes, vast consequences, and little time to dither, the receivership process and its participants require stable, clear and predictable jurisprudence. One issue, however, continues to elude these jurisprudential virtues: is the FDIC, when acting as a failed bank’s receiver, considered an agency of the United States, or merely a private party? Surprisingly, the answer is far from clear, and the ramifications significant and numerous. Years of judicial analysis have produced cacophony, not chorus, and there is a startling absence of scholarly exposition. This article, after outlining the problem, delineates and critically evaluates two solutions.","PeriodicalId":402940,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Governmentally Owned Firms (Topic)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2010-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126915178","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Bridging the Divide - Commercial Procurement and Supply Chain Management: Are There Lessons for Health Care Commissioning in England? 弥合鸿沟-商业采购和供应链管理:有经验的医疗保健委托在英格兰?
ERN: Governmentally Owned Firms (Topic) Pub Date : 2008-06-02 DOI: 10.1108/JOPP-09-01-2009-B003
B. Allen, Elizabeth Wade, H. Dickinson
{"title":"Bridging the Divide - Commercial Procurement and Supply Chain Management: Are There Lessons for Health Care Commissioning in England?","authors":"B. Allen, Elizabeth Wade, H. Dickinson","doi":"10.1108/JOPP-09-01-2009-B003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-09-01-2009-B003","url":null,"abstract":"Current English health policy is focused on strengthening the ‘demand-side’ of the health care system. Recent reforms are designed to significantly enhance the capability and status of the organisations responsible for commissioning health care services and, in so doing, to address some of the perceived problems of a historically provider/supplierled health system. In this context, commissioning organisations are being encouraged to draw on concepts and processes derived from commercial procurement and supply chain management (SCM) as they develop their expertise. While the application of such principles in the health sector is not new, existing work in the UK has not often considered the role of health care purchasers in the management of health service supply-chains. This paper describes the status of commissioning in the NHS, briefly reviews the procurement and SCM literature and begins to explore the links between them. It lays the foundations for further work which will test the extent to which lessons can be extracted in principle from the procurement literature and applied in practice by health care commissioners.","PeriodicalId":402940,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Governmentally Owned Firms (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134484750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信