Aristos: A biannual journal featuring excellent student works最新文献

Aristos: A biannual journal featuring excellent student works Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI: 10.32613/aristos/2020.5.1.4

I. Pertierra

{"title":"Kuhn the Contextualist?","authors":"I. Pertierra","doi":"10.32613/aristos/2020.5.1.4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.32613/aristos/2020.5.1.4","url":null,"abstract":"According to Kuhn’s account of the nature of scientific paradigms, how one experiences the world varies drastically from one context to another depending on the accepted paradigm of the context in question. In other words, one’s pre-existing conceptual structure concerning the world not only acts as an epistemological framework for its possible understanding, but also fundamentally affects the phenomenological observations of the world as something; this latter function of the conceptual structure motivates the view that mature scientific paradigms/theories and the data of scientific observation/experimentation are essentially two sides of the same coin.\u0000\u0000What is interesting, then, is that even between different historical eras that generally regarded the world in clearly incompatible ways, albeit still informed by paradigms, Kuhn still attributes scientific knowledge to each. To make sense of this, the explanatory resources of epistemological contextualism are used to specify potentially one way in which epistemic standards for knowledge must change between different historical eras for one to justifiably claim scientific knowledge within these different contexts.\u0000\u0000As we shall see, the argument for Kuhn’s account of paradigm being contextualist in character is apparently best made through the notion of doubt-driven context-shifts as actualising change in the form of P between different contexts in which “S knows that P” is asserted. As such, this paper first explores Kuhn’s account of scientific knowledge and paradigms before considering how the account can be considered contextualist in nature. Moreover, other context-concerned systems, such as Traditional, and Subject-Sensitive Invariantism, are briefly investigated to substantiate claims of what cannot be accurately ascribed to Kuhn’s epistemology.","PeriodicalId":392332,"journal":{"name":"Aristos: A biannual journal featuring excellent student works","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115074517","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Two Prosōpa, one Prosōpon; the Christology of Nestorius of Constantinople 两个Prosōpa，一个Prosōpon;君士坦丁堡的聂斯脱里的基督论

Aristos: A biannual journal featuring excellent student works Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI: 10.32613/aristos/2020.5.1.9

Danijel Uremovic

引用次数: 1

The Taste and Perfume of the Virgin: Mary and the Nuptial Meaning of Eucharistic Sacramentality 圣母的味道与芬芳:玛利亚与圣体圣事的婚礼意义

Aristos: A biannual journal featuring excellent student works Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI: 10.32613/aristos/2020.5.1.5

Noel Custodio

引用次数: 0

Divine Impassibility: A Comparison of Weinandy's and Culpepper's Perspectives on Whether God Suffers 神的不可性:维因安迪与卡尔佩珀关于上帝是否受苦的观点之比较

Aristos: A biannual journal featuring excellent student works Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI: 10.32613/aristos/2020.5.1.6

E. Flynn

{"title":"Divine Impassibility: A Comparison of Weinandy's and Culpepper's Perspectives on Whether God Suffers","authors":"E. Flynn","doi":"10.32613/aristos/2020.5.1.6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.32613/aristos/2020.5.1.6","url":null,"abstract":"From being generally regarded as a philosophical and theological impossibility, since the late nineteenth century the idea that God suffers has become popular and attractive among a vast array of Christian theologians. Due to this shift, many theologians no longer see the need to argue for it and divine passibility has even been called the ‘new orthodoxy.’ The matter has not yet been laid to rest and is made more complex because the terms ‘suffering’ and ‘impassibility’ are used with a variety of connotations.\u0000\u0000At the heart of the debate is the desire to assert God’s personalised love for all human beings. If suffering is intrinsic to love, as some ‘passibilists’ state, only a suffering God can also be a God who loves humankind absolutely and unconditionally. Also at stake is the salvation of human beings. For some, a suffering God necessarily implies His lack of transcendence and thus His impotence. From their perspective, Jesus suffers only in His humanity. The divine attributes of omnipotence and immutability are wholly unaffected by the crucifixion. For others, the intimacy of the hypostatic union makes it possible to attribute suffering to the Son in His divinity. Furthermore, by deciding to grant free will to humankind, God makes Himself vulnerable; the eternal knowledge of the divine permission for evil establishes an ‘eternal wound’ in God. This essay will examine the contrasting positions of Thomas Weinandy and Gary Culpepper to assess how it can be said that God must or must not suffer.","PeriodicalId":392332,"journal":{"name":"Aristos: A biannual journal featuring excellent student works","volume":"308 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131818750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Why is Love Considered the Greatest of the Theological Virtues? 为什么爱被认为是最伟大的神学美德?

Aristos: A biannual journal featuring excellent student works Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI: 10.32613/aristos/2020.5.1.7

Harry McClifty

引用次数: 1

An Examination of the Significance of the Trinitarian Theology of St. Augustine 考察圣奥古斯丁三位一体神学的意义

Aristos: A biannual journal featuring excellent student works Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI: 10.32613/aristos/2020.5.1.8

Zolt Salontai

引用次数: 0