Literature as Thought Experiment?最新文献

The Epistemic Potential of Boredom: Wilhelm Genazino’s If we were animals as a Thought Experiment 无聊的认知潜力:威廉·热纳齐诺的《如果我们是动物作为思想实验》

Literature as Thought Experiment? Pub Date : 2019-05-02 DOI: 10.30965/9783846764299_016

Loreen Dalski

引用次数: 0

The Cognitive Value and Ethical Relevance of Fictional Literature 小说文学的认知价值与伦理关联

Literature as Thought Experiment? Pub Date : 2019-05-02 DOI: 10.30965/9783846764299_003

Gottfried Gabriel

引用次数: 0

Alternate Lives: Autofictional Thought Experiments in Lunar Park by Bret Easton Ellis 布雷特·伊斯顿·埃利斯的《交替生活:月球公园里的自虚构思想实验》

Literature as Thought Experiment? Pub Date : 2019-05-02 DOI: 10.30965/9783846764299_017

J. Franzén

引用次数: 0

Imaginative Investigations: Thought Experiments in Science, Philosophy and Literature 富于想象力的调查:科学、哲学和文学中的思想实验

Literature as Thought Experiment? Pub Date : 2019-05-02 DOI: 10.30965/9783846764299_002

C. Elgin

引用次数: 1

Conjugations of the ›What If‹: Golden Age Science Fiction: From Thought Experiment to Narrative Critique 《如果:黄金时代科幻小说:从思想实验到叙事批判

Literature as Thought Experiment? Pub Date : 2019-05-02 DOI: 10.30965/9783846764299_015

S. Packard

引用次数: 0

Thought Experiments as a Narrative Genre 思维实验作为一种叙事类型

Literature as Thought Experiment? Pub Date : 2019-05-02 DOI: 10.30965/9783846764299_008

A. Willée

引用次数: 3

The Literary Thought Experiment as Emotional Experience: Émile Zola’s Thérèse Raquin (1867) 作为情感体验的文学思想实验:Émile左拉的《心灵的升华》(1867)

Literature as Thought Experiment? Pub Date : 2019-05-02 DOI: 10.30965/9783846764299_010

Katja Hettich

引用次数: 0

The Physicists by Friedrich Dürrenmatt – a Paradoxical Thought Experiment about Scientific Responsibility 《物理学家》，作者:Friedrich d<s:1>伦马特——一个关于科学责任的矛盾的思想实验

Literature as Thought Experiment? Pub Date : 2019-05-02 DOI: 10.30965/9783846764299_014

Sophia Alt, C. Brand, Vanessa Haazipolo

引用次数: 0

Power and Limits of a Picture: On the Notion of Thought Experiments in Philosophy of Literature 画面的力量与局限:文学哲学中的思想实验概念

Literature as Thought Experiment? Pub Date : 2019-05-02 DOI: 10.30965/9783846764299_007

W. Huemer

{"title":"Power and Limits of a Picture: On the Notion of Thought Experiments in Philosophy of Literature","authors":"W. Huemer","doi":"10.30965/9783846764299_007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.30965/9783846764299_007","url":null,"abstract":"Most philosophers, it seems, like things neat and tidy; many hold on to the ideal that we should aim at revealing the deep structures of reality by performing clean cuts that – to use Plato’s oft-quoted metaphor — »carve nature at its joints.«1 They are not likely to accept the very idea that reality might be unstructured, messy, or chaotic, nothing but a »blooming, buzzing confusion,«2 arbitrarily composed of a vast range of phenomena of the most different kinds. According to this image, the unstructured manifold that presents itself to our senses is overwhelming only for the untrained eye of the novice – while the sage, who knows what to look for, can discern the deeper, underlying structure of reality. In order to do so, one has to have attuned oneself – or better: one’s perceptual apparatus – to the relevant aspects of our environment, one has to have figured out which properties indicate or instantiate the deep, underlying structure of reality. The natural sciences, it is often suggested, provide for privileged ways to individuate the properties that should be considered salient – or »élite« – properties,3 and scientific experiments – including thought experiments – are their most powerful means to do so. The philosophers’ fondness of things being neat and tidy also exists in the philosophy of literature. This tendency, in my point of view, sometimes constitutes a serious obstacle for finding the most obvious solutions to the problems that are at the center of debate (and which, incidentally, are often presented in the form of a paradox): It is not always clear (to me) that philosophers who work in the field are willing to appreciate that the very term »literature« does not carve nature – in this case the nature of artifacts or socially constructed phenomena – at its joints. The term is used for a huge variety of phenomena – ranging from historical novels to fairy tales, from autobiography to science fiction, from Greek tragedy to Dadaist poetry. The very conception of literature has changed essentially over the centuries and varies substantially from one culture to another. Moreover, the differences are not only to be located in the text: As Peter Kivy has recently pointed out, there are also great differences among readers (Kivy 2011, 32ff), who approach works of literature with very different interests and expectations. Thus, we should not expect to be able to find a short, clear-cut, and homogeneous answer to the question concerning the nature and value of »literature«; we should rather be prepared to end up with a long, detailed, and multifarious account.","PeriodicalId":378245,"journal":{"name":"Literature as Thought Experiment?","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129283851","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Fiction as Thought Experiment? 小说是思想实验吗?

Literature as Thought Experiment? Pub Date : 2019-05-02 DOI: 10.30965/9783846764299_004

C. Schildknecht

引用次数: 0