Property Rights: A Re-Examination最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
A Conclusion of Sorts 各种各样的结论
Property Rights: A Re-Examination Pub Date : 2020-03-11 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198830122.003.0010
J. Penner
{"title":"A Conclusion of Sorts","authors":"J. Penner","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198830122.003.0010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198830122.003.0010","url":null,"abstract":"Where have we got to? As the title of the book indicates, this has been a re-examination of a number of issues that I think are vital to our comprehension of property rights. I am conscious of the fact that this book, taken as a whole, is somewhat ‘bitty’ or fragmented. I have addressed a number of distinct issues, and my purpose has not been to advance or defend a comprehensive theory of property rights. But let me just recapitulate some of its themes....","PeriodicalId":369122,"journal":{"name":"Property Rights: A Re-Examination","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115033866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Hohfeldian Liberties
Property Rights: A Re-Examination Pub Date : 2020-03-11 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198830122.003.0003
J. E. Penner
{"title":"Hohfeldian Liberties","authors":"J. E. Penner","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198830122.003.0003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198830122.003.0003","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines the bilaterality, or bilateral structure, of Hohfeldian jural relations, and Hohfeld’s ‘disambiguation project’, that is, his project to ensure that the ambiguous term ‘right’ can be revealed to show that it covers four different sorts of ‘right’: right–duty, liberty–no right, power–liability, and immunity–disability. Consequently, according to Hohfeld, there being a right is necessary and sufficient to there being a duty and vice versa. The chapter discusses how this disambiguation of the term assists in legal, particularly judicial, reasoning. It then criticizes Hohfeld’s characterization of liberties, in particular showing that Hohfeld mischaracterized those areas of human conduct not regulated by law or morality.","PeriodicalId":369122,"journal":{"name":"Property Rights: A Re-Examination","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114413277","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信