Alain Létourneau, Geneviève Boivin, Nicolas Bencherki
{"title":"Practices of Dialogue, Dialogues in Practice","authors":"Alain Létourneau, Geneviève Boivin, Nicolas Bencherki","doi":"10.1075/ld.00144.let","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00144.let","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":368017,"journal":{"name":"Practices of Dialogue, Dialogues in Practice","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124394934","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Constituting climate change in dialogic practice","authors":"Leanna K. Smithberger","doi":"10.1075/ld.00146.smi","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00146.smi","url":null,"abstract":"In this essay, I present data from a regional climate conference\u0000 to demonstrate how speakers engage in dialogic practice to constitute a moral\u0000 universe of climate actors. I employ the notion of the science-policy-practice\u0000 dialogue to introduce three identity categories – scientist expert, elected\u0000 policymaker, and practitioner – which participants use to position themselves\u0000 and relate to others and their environments. Using discourse analysis, I attend\u0000 to the membership categorization devices speakers use to deploy these identity\u0000 categories and constitute the cast of climate characters. Speakers assign\u0000 themselves and others to identity categories by making claims to enoughness,\u0000 which are then used to establish expectations and justify actions.","PeriodicalId":368017,"journal":{"name":"Practices of Dialogue, Dialogues in Practice","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128715439","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Debaters’ actions to manage interaction in the context of the debate talk show","authors":"Alena L. Vasilyeva","doi":"10.1075/ld.00148.vas","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00148.vas","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000The project explores how conflict is managed in a debate talk show that addresses the current situation in Belarus and its future. The analysis shows that the debaters act as co-designers of the debate activity. They indicate a variety of moves that they find inappropriate (e.g., personal attacks) and use various interactional resources to challenge these actions, which is done directly (e.g., directly naming inappropriate actions) and indirectly (e.g., nonverbal actions). Their interventions are aimed at managing interaction, but at the same time, they undermine their opponents’ image. Furthermore, the study highlights the importance of identities as an interactional resource to shape interaction. The analysis also demonstrates the role of a multi-party structure of the debate in managing interaction.","PeriodicalId":368017,"journal":{"name":"Practices of Dialogue, Dialogues in Practice","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128887128","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A critique of the adjacency pair dogma","authors":"François Cooren, Frédéric Dion, Matthieu Balay","doi":"10.1075/ld.00145.coo","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00145.coo","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Drawing inspiration from key authors such as Weick, Taylor and Van Every, Greimas, Goffman, Sbisà, and Tsui, we\u0000 propose to explore what we call the basic organizing unit, in other words, the minimal form that a sequence of action must take in\u0000 order to claim a certain degree of organizationality. In order to empirically test this proposition, we purposively analyze\u0000 interactions taking place outside of a classical organizational context, i.e., street hypnosis sessions. What interests us is not\u0000 only how these sessions are organized, but also how they organize themselves. Our aim, therefore, is to identify key moments when\u0000 a certain organizationality seems to express itself, an organizationality that we propose to detect through the identification of\u0000 these basic organizing units. This leads us to show that the adjacency pair model, which has been historically\u0000 defined as a fundamental unit of conversational organization should, in fact, be replaced by our triadic model of interaction.","PeriodicalId":368017,"journal":{"name":"Practices of Dialogue, Dialogues in Practice","volume":"146 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132936894","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
L. Hallgren, H. Bergeå, Emily Montgomerie, L. Westberg
{"title":"“I don’t know if we should have that discussion now”","authors":"L. Hallgren, H. Bergeå, Emily Montgomerie, L. Westberg","doi":"10.1075/ld.00147.hal","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00147.hal","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Collaborative governance within natural resource management relies on dialogical forums where people can negotiate\u0000 complex issues through conversations. In this paper, we investigate situations where procedural frames around these discussions\u0000 are negotiated in the conversations between its participants in a corpus from five different natural resource management contexts.\u0000 We present how frame discussions are initiated, how actors express that actions are not aligned with the frames, and finally, how\u0000 these openings of discourse about the frames are interactively managed, maintained, and closed. We argue norms of inclusiveness,\u0000 consensus, and performance shape the interaction and hamper the joint investigation of the frames, and undermine the entire\u0000 justification of the collaborative processes and the core quality of dialogical conversations.","PeriodicalId":368017,"journal":{"name":"Practices of Dialogue, Dialogues in Practice","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134045167","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"“Doing being an involved parent”","authors":"Vittoria Colla","doi":"10.1075/ld.00150.col","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00150.col","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 The present study investigates the increasingly common phenomenon of parental involvement in children’s education\u0000 from a dialogic perspective. Drawing on video-recorded parent-child homework conversations in Italian families and adopting a\u0000 conversation analysis-informed approach, the study analyzes how a value-laden cultural notion like ‘family-school partnership’ is\u0000 given ‘dialogic existence’ through a variety of discursive practices. Specifically, it identifies four practices deployed by\u0000 parents when supervising children’s homework: (1) making the teacher speak, (2) drawing parallels between family and school, (3)\u0000 siding with the teacher, and (4) adopting a teacher-like evaluative stance. Beyond their specificities, all these practices\u0000 reproduce the school’s institutional culture inside the home. It is argued that, through these practices, parents ‘do being\u0000 involved’ in homework and implement a partnership based on shared values between family and school.","PeriodicalId":368017,"journal":{"name":"Practices of Dialogue, Dialogues in Practice","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114240616","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Debate or dialogue?","authors":"Iveta Žákovská","doi":"10.1075/ld.00149.zak","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00149.zak","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 The present paper deals with an example of a TV broadcast discussion program, the Czech program Máte\u0000 slovo, in which a dialogue fails. It presents a closer analysis of one representative episode of the program, which,\u0000 despite being officially presented as offering space for discussion and a chance for ordinary citizens to talk to public\u0000 personalities and politicians, takes the form of confrontainment, whose goal is to escalate debate. The paper reveals what\u0000 practices by the discussants and the moderator contribute to the failure of a successful dialogue and discusses the role of\u0000 broadcast programs of this kind in the contemporary communication sphere.","PeriodicalId":368017,"journal":{"name":"Practices of Dialogue, Dialogues in Practice","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126700552","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
