Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Volume 58最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
What is eikasia? 什么是艾卡西亚?
Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Volume 58 Pub Date : 2020-11-17 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198858997.003.0002
Damien Storey
{"title":"What is eikasia?","authors":"Damien Storey","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198858997.003.0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198858997.003.0002","url":null,"abstract":"This paper defends a reading of eikasia—the lowest kind of cognition in the Divided Line—as a kind of empirical cognition that Plato appeals to when explaining, among other things, the origin of ethical error. The paper has two central claims. First, eikasia with respect to, for example, goodness or justice is not different in kind to eikasia with respect to purely sensory images like shadows and reflections: the only difference is that in the first case the sensory images include representations of value properties. Second, eikasia is not the bare awareness of images or simply a label for an error (mistaking image for original) but a kind of empirical, image-confined cognition, and one that has an important part to play in characterizing the cognitive abilities of the non-rational parts of the soul.","PeriodicalId":345213,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Volume 58","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116724710","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Aristotle on Spontaneous Generation, Spontaneity, and Natural Processes 亚里士多德论自然产生、自发性和自然过程
Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Volume 58 Pub Date : 2020-11-17 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198858997.003.0005
Emily Kress
{"title":"Aristotle on Spontaneous Generation, Spontaneity, and Natural Processes","authors":"Emily Kress","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198858997.003.0005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198858997.003.0005","url":null,"abstract":"Aristotle contrasts standard animal generation with ‘spontaneous generation’, which happens when some material putrefies and gives rise to a new organism. This paper addresses two interrelated puzzles about spontaneous generation. First, is it of the same ‘fundamental kind’ of causal process as standard generation? Second, is it ‘spontaneous’, as understood in Physics 2.4–6: rare, accidentally caused, and among things that are for the sake of something? I argue that both puzzles turn on the same questions about the process types involved. I show that the type putrefaction plays a more important role in spontaneous generation than has been recognized so far. Because putrefaction does not play this role in standard generation, the two processes are of different ‘fundamental’ kinds. Moreover, spontaneous generation happens rarely in that it is rare for processes of putrefaction to happen in such a way that they can also be described in terms of concoction.","PeriodicalId":345213,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Volume 58","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129174906","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Plato On The Unity of the Political Arts (Statesman 258 D–259D) 柏拉图论政治艺术的统一性(政治家258 D-259D)
Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Volume 58 Pub Date : 2020-11-17 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198858997.003.0001
Eric Brown
{"title":"Plato On The Unity of the Political Arts (Statesman 258 D–259D)","authors":"Eric Brown","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198858997.003.0001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198858997.003.0001","url":null,"abstract":"Plato argues that four political arts—politics, kingship, slaveholding, and household-management—are the same. His argument, which prompted Aristotle’s reply in Politics I, has been universally panned. I consider and reject three ways of saving the argument, and argue for a fourth. On my view, Plato assumes that politics is identical with kingship, just as he does elsewhere, but he begs no questions because the point of his argument is to identify the public arts of politics and kingship with the private arts of household-management and slaveholding. He does this successfully by addressing three reasons why one might distinguish the private from the public arts. His argument leaves room for Aristotle to propose other reasons. One of them—involving differences among men and women and slaves—is unfortunate, but another is more promising. The Aristotelian can assume that political expertise is a matter of know-how gathered by experience of the particular actions which differ in the public and private arts. But Plato might well be right to reject this, and to insist that the essential difference between the expert and non-expert—the dividing line between good and bad rule—is not in experience but in their grasp of their goals.","PeriodicalId":345213,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Volume 58","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115862121","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信