{"title":"공휴일 중복일수가 총이윤에 미치는 영향 (The Effects of the Number of Overlapping Days on Holidays on Total Profit)","authors":"Deok-su Kim","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3897352","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3897352","url":null,"abstract":"Korean Abstract: 본 연구는 공휴일 중복일수를 통해 노동일의 증가가 이윤에 미치는 효과를 간접적으로 추정하 고자 한다. 총영업잉여를 총노동시간에 회귀시키는 회귀모형을 제안하고 잔차와 설명변수의 상관 관계에 의한 비일관성을 2SLS로 해결한다. 법정공휴일과 일요일이 중복되었다면 노동일이 추가 된 것이기 때문에 이는 노동일 증가로 영향을 준다. 한편으로 중복일수는 해마다 무작위적으로 일어났기 때문에 노동력의 가치와 상관관계가 없다. 이를 도구변수로 활용하면 절대적 잉여가치 착취가 이윤에 미친 효과를 추정해볼 수 있다. English Abstract: This study indirectly estimates the effect of the increase in working days on profits through the number of overlapping holidays. propose a regression model that regresses total operating surplus on total labor time, and 2SLS solves the inconsistent by the correlation between residuals and explanatory variables. If legal holidays and Sundays overlapped, the working days are added, which affects the increase in working days. And since the number of overlapping holidays occurred randomly from year to year, there is no correlation with the value of the labor force. If this is used as an instrument variable, the effect of exploitation of absolute surplus value can be estimated on profits.","PeriodicalId":332131,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Marxism/Class-System Theory (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128708861","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Profit for Marxists","authors":"Egmont Kakarot-Handtke","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2414301","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2414301","url":null,"abstract":"Marxian economics and standard economics are widely different yet they share a central weakness: the respective profit theories are demonstrably false – each one in its own characteristic way. Roughly speaking, Marx tried to explain profit by objective factors while standard economics cites subjective factors. For different reasons, neither route led to satisfactory results. The conclusion is straightforward: one has to do better. The conceptual consequence is to first reconstruct the profit theory from a solid basis with no regard to either Marxian or standard premises. In order to succeed, objective-structural axioms have to be taken as formal point of departure.","PeriodicalId":332131,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Marxism/Class-System Theory (Topic)","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123455382","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}