CJRN: Crime Investigation (Topic)最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Analysis of the International Legal and Regulatory Framework for Cooperation in the Field of Combating Corruption 《打击腐败领域合作的国际法律和监管框架》分析
CJRN: Crime Investigation (Topic) Pub Date : 2021-05-05 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3869519
I. Kucherkov, Dmitry Grigoriev, Mattia Masolletti
{"title":"Analysis of the International Legal and Regulatory Framework for Cooperation in the Field of Combating Corruption","authors":"I. Kucherkov, Dmitry Grigoriev, Mattia Masolletti","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3869519","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3869519","url":null,"abstract":"The article provides a legal analysis of the international legal framework for cooperation in the fight against corruption. The authors of the study pay attention to the assessment of the UN and OECD regulations in the field of anti-corruption. Special attention is paid to the analysis of the so-called Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials, adopted by the UN General Assembly on December 17, 1979.","PeriodicalId":331836,"journal":{"name":"CJRN: Crime Investigation (Topic)","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116190481","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Federal Civil Litigation as an Instrument of Police Reform: A Natural Experiment Exploring the Effects of the Floyd Ruling on Stop-And-Frisk Activities in New York City 联邦民事诉讼作为警察改革的工具:一个探索弗洛伊德裁决对纽约市拦截搜身活动影响的自然实验
CJRN: Crime Investigation (Topic) Pub Date : 2016-05-03 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.2832337
M. White, Henry F. Fradella, W. Morrow, Douglas Mellom
{"title":"Federal Civil Litigation as an Instrument of Police Reform: A Natural Experiment Exploring the Effects of the Floyd Ruling on Stop-And-Frisk Activities in New York City","authors":"M. White, Henry F. Fradella, W. Morrow, Douglas Mellom","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2832337","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2832337","url":null,"abstract":"Stop-and-frisk has emerged as a popular crime control tactic in American policing. Though stop-and-frisk has a long, established legal history, the recent experiences in many jurisdictions demonstrate a strong disconnect between principle and practice. Arguably, stop-and-frisk has become the next iteration of a persistent undercurrent in racial injustice in American policing, perhaps best demonstrated by the recent police killings of Eric Garner, Michael Brown, and Freddie Gray — all during stop-and-frisk encounters. Recent events have facilitated a national dialogue on police accountability and police reform, and federal civil litigation has been central to that discussion. Although federal court relief can be pursued through a variety of avenues (most frequently by individuals or class actions under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 or by the U.S. Department of Justice pursuant to 42 U.S.C § 14141), very little research has examined the impact of federal civil litigation on unconstitutional police practices. The current study examines the New York City confluence of racial injustice in policing, misuse of stop-and-frisk by officers, and federal civil litigation designed to precipitate police reform. Authors employ a natural experimental design to conduct a year-to-year comparison of stop-and-frisk activities and outcomes conducted by the NYPD in 2011, during the height of their stop-and-frisk program, and 2014, one year after a federal court deemed the program unconstitutional and ordered reforms. Results show substantial improvement in stop-and-frisk practices following the federal civil litigation, including reduced prevalence and geographic concentration, as well as increased rates of arrest and weapon and contraband seizures. Moreover, crime continued to decline in New York as the NYPD reformed its stop-and-frisk program. Even though racial disparities in those subjected to stops by the NYPD persist, the overall findings show positive progress in New York and highlight the role of federal civil litigation as an instrument of police reform.","PeriodicalId":331836,"journal":{"name":"CJRN: Crime Investigation (Topic)","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121533147","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信