Corporate Finance 2最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Board Independence, Ownership Concentration and Corporate Performance - Chinese Evidence 董事会独立性、股权集中度与公司绩效——中国证据
Corporate Finance 2 Pub Date : 2014-01-01 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1919277
Ke Li, Lei Lu, Usha R. Mittoo, Zhou Zhang
{"title":"Board Independence, Ownership Concentration and Corporate Performance - Chinese Evidence","authors":"Ke Li, Lei Lu, Usha R. Mittoo, Zhou Zhang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1919277","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1919277","url":null,"abstract":"This paper exploits two sequential exogenous regulatory reforms in China (2001 board independence and 2005 share restructure) to study the incremental effect of the board independence on firm performance as ownership concentration declines. We examine this effect in the 2003–2008 period when independent directors' ratio was relatively stable but ownership concentration declined significantly among Chinese publicly listed firms. We find that the impact of board independence on firm performance increases as ownership concentration declines but this effect varies by the types of ownership. Private-controlled firms exhibit statistically and economically significant positive board effectiveness, whereas state-controlled firms have insignificant effects, irrespective of whether they are state or locally controlled. The results are robust to a battery of endogeneity checks and are stronger with market-based (Tobin's Q) performance measure compared to accounting-based measure (ROA). Our results support the notion that high ownership concentration has a moderating influence on board effectiveness but the effect also depends on ownership types and the country's institutional environment.","PeriodicalId":329558,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Finance 2","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126837415","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 100
The Value of Blockholder Liquidity and the Decision to Unify Share Classes 大股东流动性价值与股票类别统一决策
Corporate Finance 2 Pub Date : 2011-09-15 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1571760
Jason W. Howell
{"title":"The Value of Blockholder Liquidity and the Decision to Unify Share Classes","authors":"Jason W. Howell","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1571760","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1571760","url":null,"abstract":"From 1988 to 2007, over 1,100 publicly traded firms used the dual class structure. Despite the structure's effectiveness at maintaining control, approximately one fourth of these firms eliminated the dual class structure. In 95 firms, superior shareholders voluntarily eliminated the dual class structure by means of a share conversion or shareholder proposal. On average, blockholders lost half of their voting power during the year of the unification (from 51.4% to 26.0%). In this study, I examine the firms who voluntarily unify their share classes in order to determine why blockholders willingly give up such large stakes in voting power. I find 70% of unifying firms specifically state \"increase liquidity\" as a primary reason for unifying their share classes. Also, I find blockholders maintain or slightly increase their voting power prior to the uni cation, but then dramatically decrease their voting power in the three years after the unification. I find two-thirds of the drop in voting power is attributable to reductions in blockholder holdings rather than share dilutions. In addition, I find over 40% of blockholders completely exit the firm within three years. Based on the empirical evidence, I conclude blockholders are willing to lose signi cant portions of voting power in order to increase their own personal liquidity.","PeriodicalId":329558,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Finance 2","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122482477","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信