Logical Empiricism and the Physical Sciences最新文献

Kurt Grelling and the Idiosyncrasy of the Berlin Logical Empiricism 库尔特·格雷林与柏林逻辑经验主义的特质

Logical Empiricism and the Physical Sciences Pub Date : 2021-04-02 DOI: 10.4324/9780429429835-4

N. Milkov

{"title":"Kurt Grelling and the Idiosyncrasy of the Berlin Logical Empiricism","authors":"N. Milkov","doi":"10.4324/9780429429835-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429429835-4","url":null,"abstract":": The received view has it that Hans Reichenbach and his friends of the Berlin Group worked close together with the more prominent Vienna Circle. In the wake of this view, Reichenbach was often treated as a logical positivist – despite the fact that he decisively opposed it. In this chapter we follow another thread. We shall show the “third man”– besides Reichenbach and Walter Dubislav – of the Berlin Group, Kurt Grelling, as a man who could grasp the academic trends of the time faster than anybody else, who was better informed about logic and philosophy of nature than his two prominent colleagues and thus, could better delineate, although tentatively, central threads of research of the Berlin Group. Grelling did this on several occasions, but most ostensibly in the last years of his life when he was focused on problems of formal ontology. On the basis of this analysis, we shall see that in the early 1920s, Reichenbach too was led by a project in ontology of science that he elaborated together with the psychologist Kurt Lewin. Moreover, Reichenbach’s later philosophy of nature was also shaped by this project. We present this direction of philosophy of science as a “road less travelled” which, however, if revived, can point to a new direction that will more closely connect philosophy and science.","PeriodicalId":314224,"journal":{"name":"Logical Empiricism and the Physical Sciences","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115685208","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

From the Periphery to the Center 从外围到中心

Logical Empiricism and the Physical Sciences Pub Date : 2021-04-02 DOI: 10.4324/9780429429835-19

M. Neuber

引用次数: 0

The Legacy of Logical Empiricism 逻辑经验主义的遗产

Logical Empiricism and the Physical Sciences Pub Date : 2019-08-26 DOI: 10.4324/9780429429835-14

C. Glymour

引用次数: 0

Two Constants in Carnap’s View on Scientific Theories 卡尔纳普科学理论观中的两个常数

Logical Empiricism and the Physical Sciences Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.4324/9780429429835-18

Sebastian Lutz

{"title":"Two Constants in Carnap’s View on Scientific Theories","authors":"Sebastian Lutz","doi":"10.4324/9780429429835-18","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429429835-18","url":null,"abstract":"The received view on the development of the correspondence rules in Carnap’s philosophy of science is that at first, Carnap assumed the explicit definability of all theoretical terms in observational terms and later weakened this assumption. In the end, he conjectured that all observational terms can be explicitly defined in in theoretical terms, but not vice versa. I argue that from the very beginning, Carnap implicitly held this last view, albeit at times in contradiction to his professed position. To establish this point I argue that, first, Carnap’s ‘Über die Aufgabe der Physik’ is a contribution to the philosophy of science of logical empiricism, contrary to Thomas Mormann and in agreement with Herbert Feigl. Second, Michael Friedman misunderstands the ‘Aufgabe’ with his claim that it describes a method for arriving at explicit definitions for theoretical terms. Another received view on Carnap’s philosophy of science is that it assumed a formalization of physical theories that was too detached from actual physics and thus justly disavowed in favor of the semantic view as, for example, developed by van Fraassen. But the ‘Aufgabe’ and related works including the Aufbau show that from the very beginning to his last works, Carnap suggested formalizing physical theories as restrictions in mathematical spaces, as in the state-space conception of scientific theories favored by van Fraassen.","PeriodicalId":314224,"journal":{"name":"Logical Empiricism and the Physical Sciences","volume":"205 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114755203","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0