Reports on Progress in Energy最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Making electrification models more realistic by incorporating differences in institutional quality and financing cost 通过纳入制度质量和融资成本的差异,使电气化模型更加现实
Reports on Progress in Energy Pub Date : 2019-10-30 DOI: 10.1088/2516-1083/ab43a3
T. Schmidt
{"title":"Making electrification models more realistic by incorporating differences in institutional quality and financing cost","authors":"T. Schmidt","doi":"10.1088/2516-1083/ab43a3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2516-1083/ab43a3","url":null,"abstract":"Globally, about 800 million people lack access to electricity. To address this situation, the sustainable development goals (SDGs) aim to reach universal electrification by 2030, a goal that requires annual investments in the ballpark of US$50 billion over the next 10 years. Several organizations, such as the United Nations’ Sustainable Energy for All initiative and the World Bank, support the governments of developing countries in their electrification efforts. Cost-minimizing models are a widely used tool to help governments decide where and in which technologies to invest or to create investment incentives for the private sector. Often, geospatial models are used to decide on technology and estimate market size for the different electrification alternatives: main grid extension, mini-grids, or solar-home systems. Here, I briefly describe the literature and identify a major weakness of these models: their ignorance of institutional quality, i.e. the quality of government, jurisdiction, regulation, and public services. I elaborate on the role of institutional quality for electrification, which strongly affects the success of projects and real-world investment decisions. I then argue that the emerging literature on off-grid financing can be used to consider institutional quality in cost-minimizing models. I conclude by recommending concrete steps that should be taken in order to make these models and thereby electrification planning and budget allocations more realistic.","PeriodicalId":303573,"journal":{"name":"Reports on Progress in Energy","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127681446","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信