Sheffield Castle: Archaeology, Archives, Regeneration, 1927–2018最新文献

Pots, Pins and People 锅、别针和人

Sheffield Castle: Archaeology, Archives, Regeneration, 1927–2018 Pub Date : 2020-09-02 DOI: 10.22599/sheffieldcastle.f

引用次数: 0

Preface: Biography of a Castle 前言:《城堡传》

Sheffield Castle: Archaeology, Archives, Regeneration, 1927–2018 Pub Date : 2020-09-02 DOI: 10.22599/sheffieldcastle.n

引用次数: 0

Epilogue 后记

Sheffield Castle: Archaeology, Archives, Regeneration, 1927–2018 Pub Date : 2020-09-02 DOI: 10.22599/sheffieldcastle.j

引用次数: 0

Modern Excavation and Regeneration, 1999–2018 现代挖掘与再生，1999-2018

Sheffield Castle: Archaeology, Archives, Regeneration, 1927–2018 Pub Date : 2020-09-02 DOI: 10.22599/sheffieldcastle.g

A. Tuck, M. Rajić

引用次数: 0

‘Long before Castles Were Thought of’: Sheffield Castle and Deep History “早在人们想到城堡之前”:谢菲尔德城堡和深刻的历史

Sheffield Castle: Archaeology, Archives, Regeneration, 1927–2018 Pub Date : 2020-09-02 DOI: 10.22599/sheffieldcastle.e

引用次数: 0

Archaeological Practice in the Inter-War Years 两次世界大战期间的考古实践

Sheffield Castle: Archaeology, Archives, Regeneration, 1927–2018 Pub Date : 2020-09-02 DOI: 10.22599/sheffieldcastle.b

A. Armstrong

{"title":"Archaeological Practice in the Inter-War Years","authors":"A. Armstrong","doi":"10.22599/sheffieldcastle.b","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22599/sheffieldcastle.b","url":null,"abstract":"The rediscovery of Sheffield Castle commenced in earnest in 1927, with the construction of the new city-centre store of the Brightside and Carbrook Co-operative Society and (shortly afterwards) of Sheffield Corporation’s Castle Hill Market just to the north. The paper Leslie Armstrong published in the Transactions of the Hunter Archaeological Society in 1930 was based on observations made during this construction work. This seminal paper has been the principal source for all subsequent understanding of Sheffield Castle (e.g. Walton 1949, 21–2; Fine 2003, 36, 41; Jones 2004, 27; Hey 2010, 15; Hallam 2015) but has been subject to little critical scrutiny, and few have considered the inevitable shortcomings of efforts to record the remains of the castle in the pressurised circumstances of commercial construction. Nor has the role and influence of Armstrong’s collaborator Joseph Himsworth been adequately assessed or, indeed, acknowledged. In this chapter we use unpublished sources in the Museums Sheffield archive including correspondence, diaries, lecture notes and excavation records, as well as contemporary newspaper articles, to situate Armstrong and Himsworth’s work (both on site and in publication) in the context of the personalities involved, the prevailing intellectual climate, archaeological practice, and understandings of the past and of its value in contemporary society. In this first part of the story of the uncovering of Sheffield Castle, it is the amateur enthusiasts, local heroes battling against the odds, who take centre stage, the man from the Inland Revenue supported, aptly for Sheffield, by the son of a cutler. In their work we see a narrative emerging around the castle, we feel the excitement and thrill of discovery that shines through the manuscript sources – and the myth making commences.","PeriodicalId":297482,"journal":{"name":"Sheffield Castle: Archaeology, Archives, Regeneration, 1927–2018","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115861709","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Post-War Rebuilding: A New Battle for the Castle 战后重建:一场新的城堡之战

Sheffield Castle: Archaeology, Archives, Regeneration, 1927–2018 Pub Date : 2020-09-02 DOI: 10.22599/sheffieldcastle.d

{"title":"Post-War Rebuilding: A New Battle for the Castle","authors":"","doi":"10.22599/sheffieldcastle.d","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22599/sheffieldcastle.d","url":null,"abstract":"A new opportunity to record the remains of Sheffield Castle emerged at the end of the 1950s in the wake of post-War rebuilding. The Brightside and Carbrook Co-op’s store at the corner of Waingate and Exchange Street was destroyed during the bombing of Sheffield on the night of 12th/13th December 1940 (Figure 4.1). In 1949, following the compulsory purchase of their bombed headquarters by the City Council, the Co-op moved their city-centre store to temporary prefabricated premises on nearby Angel Street, before receiving planning permission for a new, more imposing, headquarters in 1958 (Figure 4.2).17 While the Castle Hill Market buildings to the north of the Co-op store ‘largely escaped damage’ (Himsworth 1927–42, 20), and temporary structures (socalled Bailey bridges) were used to ensure continued access to them (Zasada 1996, 32), parts of the Castlegate area remained derelict into the late 1950s (Butcher 1972c, 5). In 1958 the Sheffield Corporation began construction of Castle Market on the site of the former Co-op, with the intention of incorporating the Castle Hill Market into a single market-complex (Butcher 1972a, 5; Richardson and Dennison 2014a, 36; see their fig. 3 for the main elements of this complex). The new Castle Market building was intended to rehouse traders from the 100-year-old Norfolk Market Hall to the south of Exchange Street, and Castle Hill Market was refurbished and provided with new access from Castlegate (see Figure 1.15). New buildings were constructed or rebuilt fronting onto Waingate from the junction of Exchange Street to the Bull & Mouth public house at the corner of Castlegate (Zasada 1996, 32; Butcher 1972a, 10). As in the late 1920s, a formal programme of archaeological investigation was not required in advance of this regeneration of the area, but the castle remains encountered in the course of construction works were recorded by Leslie Butcher from Sheffield City Council’s Architect’s Department and John E. Bartlett, Deputy Director of the City Museum. In this chapter we discuss the nature of the recording undertaken and the resulting archive, which is an essential prelude to analysing what was found in the next chapter.","PeriodicalId":297482,"journal":{"name":"Sheffield Castle: Archaeology, Archives, Regeneration, 1927–2018","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134148173","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Sheffield and Its Castle 谢菲尔德及其城堡

Sheffield Castle: Archaeology, Archives, Regeneration, 1927–2018 Pub Date : 2020-09-02 DOI: 10.22599/sheffieldcastle.a

引用次数: 0

The Persistence of Place 地点的持久性

Sheffield Castle: Archaeology, Archives, Regeneration, 1927–2018 Pub Date : 2015-06-10 DOI: 10.22599/sheffieldcastle.i

D. Lane

引用次数: 0