ORG: Interorganizational Networks (Topic)最新文献

筛选

英文中文

Interorganizational Trust: Origins, Dysfunctions and Regulation of Rigidities 组织间信任:起源、功能障碍与僵化的调控

ORG: Interorganizational Networks (Topic) Pub Date : 2011-02-16 DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00717.x

S. Thorgren, J. Wincent

引用次数: 80

Toward a Uniform Functional Model of Payment and Securities Settlement Systems 迈向支付与证券结算系统的统一功能模型

ORG: Interorganizational Networks (Topic) Pub Date : 2010-03-01 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1947271

R. Berndsen

引用次数: 2

Concentrated Hopes, Diffused Responsibilities: Accountability in Public-Private Partnerships 集中希望，分散责任:公私伙伴关系中的问责制

ORG: Interorganizational Networks (Topic) Pub Date : 1999-04-01 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1992176

P. Robertson, M. Acar

{"title":"Concentrated Hopes, Diffused Responsibilities: Accountability in Public-Private Partnerships","authors":"P. Robertson, M. Acar","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1992176","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1992176","url":null,"abstract":"Public-private partnerships have emerged, in the last couple of decades, as a new institutional arrangement through which to deal with a variety of key societal concerns, such as environmental improvement, regional and urban economic development, and educational reforms. Despite the rapid growth in their number, scope, and influence, there is still a need for considerable theoretical and empirical work exploring the nature of these multi-sectoral collaborative arrangements. One area of inquiry in which little scholarly work has been conducted is the topic of accountability mechanisms in public-private partnerships. As the focus of this paper, we explore this topic by first identifying some of the basic properties of these partnerships as they differ from traditional hierarchical organizations. We then analyze five different accountability mechanisms that have been used to historically to enhance the accountability of public as well as private organizations. These mechanisms include bureaucratic, political, professional, legal, and market approaches to accountability. Our analysis summarizes the basic characteristics of these five approaches to accountability and examines the potential relevance of each for accountability in the context of public-private partnerships. In light of the various weaknesses of these traditional approaches, we then propose a number of guidelines regarding three alternative approaches to accountability that are more consistent with the basic nature and purpose of public-private partnerships. We conclude the paper with some brief comments regarding possible future directions for research on accountability in public-private partnerships.","PeriodicalId":293078,"journal":{"name":"ORG: Interorganizational Networks (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1999-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132116933","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 10