Investigação Qualitativa em Ciências Sociais: avanços e desafios最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA DE ESTUDOS QUALITATIVOS EM RESÍDUOS SÓLIDOS 固体废物定性研究的系统综述
Investigação Qualitativa em Ciências Sociais: avanços e desafios Pub Date : 2020-07-07 DOI: 10.36367/ntqr.4.2020.55-66
Gabriel De Pinna Mendez, C. Mahler, S. Taquette
{"title":"REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA DE ESTUDOS QUALITATIVOS EM RESÍDUOS SÓLIDOS","authors":"Gabriel De Pinna Mendez, C. Mahler, S. Taquette","doi":"10.36367/ntqr.4.2020.55-66","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.4.2020.55-66","url":null,"abstract":"métodos qualitativos. sistemática literatura os Scielo ( Scientific Electronic Library Online ), Portal de Periódicos CAPES e Web Of Science . periódicos área de resíduos ( Waste Management e Waste Management and Research ) meio “Pesquisa Qualitativa” e “Resíduos Sólidos” ( Qualitative Research and Solid Waste ); “Entrevista”, “Resíduos Sólidos” e “Percepção” ( Interviews, Solid Waste and Perception) artigos, após a aplicação de critérios de seleção descritos no presente artigo, universo foi reduzido para total de 42 publicações. artigos selecionados foram analisados e categorizados quanto aos aspectos relevantes como objetivos trabalho, Abstract. T his work intends to analyze studies related to solid waste management developed with qualitative methods. A systematic literature review of the articles published between 2014 and 2019 was made in the Scielo databases (Scientific Electronic Library Online), in the CAPES Journal Portal and Web of Science. In addition to searching for reference journals in the area of waste (Waste Management and Waste Management and Research) through the descriptors “Qualitative Research” and “Solid Waste”; “Interview”, “Solid Waste” and “Perception” (Interviews, Solid Waste and Perception) and 598 articles were found, and after applying the selection criteria the universe was reduced to a total of 42 publications. The selected articles were analyzed and categorized according to the most relevant aspects such as work objectives, study sample and main results. Qualitative research has been found to be a viable tool and can be employed on a large scale in waste-related studies. It was also found that many studies that use the term “qualitative research” do not have the necessary methodological rigor to be named. It was found that qualitative research is adequate to answer questions in the field of waste studies such as the relationship between waste and public health problems, difficulties in selective collection and other management / treatment actions, environmental impacts, irregular waste disposal and problems in the management of special waste.","PeriodicalId":292111,"journal":{"name":"Investigação Qualitativa em Ciências Sociais: avanços e desafios","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125610593","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
ANÁLISE DE DISCURSO APLICADA A INVESTIGAÇÃO QUALITATIVA: PERSPECTIVA METODOLÓGICA EM DEBATE 定性研究中的语篇分析:辩论中的方法论视角
Investigação Qualitativa em Ciências Sociais: avanços e desafios Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI: 10.36367/ntqr.4.2020.40-54
Gleny Terezinha Duro Guimarães, Marlúbia Corrêa de Paula, W. Hirai
{"title":"ANÁLISE DE DISCURSO APLICADA A INVESTIGAÇÃO QUALITATIVA: PERSPECTIVA METODOLÓGICA EM DEBATE","authors":"Gleny Terezinha Duro Guimarães, Marlúbia Corrêa de Paula, W. Hirai","doi":"10.36367/ntqr.4.2020.40-54","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.4.2020.40-54","url":null,"abstract":"In Michel Pecheux's discourse analysis (DA) there is no pre-established methodological procedure, which may generate uncertainty regarding its application. In this type of investigation, it is the theoretical assumptions that determine the method, leaving it to the analyst to trace his path. However, this process is not always visualized in the investigation. When reflecting on this aspect, the present work aims to problematize the explicit existence (or not) of a research methodology in DA and to identify the main methodological elements that are pointed out by discourse analysts. This is a qualitative-bibliographic investigation that uses as a method the historical materialism. The corpus was made up of six scientific articles. The analysis procedure included the realization of a mapping seeking regularities and singularities in the analyzed material. The results point to two types of methodological interpretation: one is a “generic way”, without explaining the procedure performed; and the other, giving visibility to it. The article concludes that it is possible to describe a methodological analysis procedure; not as an application of a technique, but as an investigation process in which the theoretical device is inseparable from the analytical one.","PeriodicalId":292111,"journal":{"name":"Investigação Qualitativa em Ciências Sociais: avanços e desafios","volume":"07 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129755737","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信