{"title":"INTERNATIONAL LAW AS OUR LAW","authors":"","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv173f229.12","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv173f229.12","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":288676,"journal":{"name":"Constitutional Diplomacy","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134474062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Souradeep Sen, A. Majumdar, Bani P. Misra, Dyutish Chakraborty
{"title":"NATIONAL SECURITY:","authors":"Souradeep Sen, A. Majumdar, Bani P. Misra, Dyutish Chakraborty","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv173f229.13","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv173f229.13","url":null,"abstract":"For the last century or so, the world has not seen a pandemic as lethal as the one which presently has it in its throes. It has been argued that the Covid-19 pandemic may seem to serve as a prelude to war, especially in the aftermath of the recent border skirmish between India and China. The present paper attempts to negate this argument, delineating instead a strategy by which the pandemic and its massively devastating after-effects would act as a new form of deterrence between the two Asian states—a ‘perilous deterrent’, but a deterrent nonetheless. The pandemic will arguably impel both nations to embark upon an urgent re-evaluation of their respective security policies. The hypothesis of this paper is verified by invoking the contingent realist theory of International Relations. India also needs to develop a more robust nuclear security protocol which would effectively deter further aggression from China and Pakistan. As a contingent realist strategy, ‘perilous deterrent’ would proffer conditional strategic choices based upon security-seeking and revisionist motives of states locked in a conflictual dyadic relationship.","PeriodicalId":288676,"journal":{"name":"Constitutional Diplomacy","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116910980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"CONGRESS VS. THE PRESIDENT","authors":"","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv173f229.6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv173f229.6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":288676,"journal":{"name":"Constitutional Diplomacy","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116788301","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：