PSN: Other International Relations Theory & Conflict (Topic)最新文献

International Relations and Political Science: Correlation of Subject Areas 国际关系与政治学:学科领域的相关性

PSN: Other International Relations Theory & Conflict (Topic) Pub Date : 2021-05-30 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3856488

M. Lebedeva

引用次数: 0

The Enemy of My Enemy Is My Friend: A New Condition for Stable Networks 敌人的敌人就是朋友:稳定网络的新状况

PSN: Other International Relations Theory & Conflict (Topic) Pub Date : 2019-12-23 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3508607

Hideto Koizumi

引用次数: 0

Shrinking Room for Hedging: System-Unit Dynamics and Behaviour of Smaller Powers 套期保值的收缩空间:系统单元动力学和较小权力的行为

PSN: Other International Relations Theory & Conflict (Topic) Pub Date : 2019-06-23 DOI: 10.1093/IRAP/LCZ011

A. Korolev

引用次数: 30

Nuclear Doctrines and Stable Strategic Relationships: The Case of South Asia 核理论与稳定的战略关系:南亚的案例

PSN: Other International Relations Theory & Conflict (Topic) Pub Date : 2016-01-08 DOI: 10.1111/1468-2346.12503

M. Shankar, T. V. Paul

{"title":"Nuclear Doctrines and Stable Strategic Relationships: The Case of South Asia","authors":"M. Shankar, T. V. Paul","doi":"10.1111/1468-2346.12503","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12503","url":null,"abstract":"This article offers a discussion of nuclear doctrines and their significance for war, peace and stability between nuclear-armed states. The cases of India and Pakistan are analysed to show the challenges these states have faced in articulating and implementing a proper nuclear doctrine, and the implications of this for nuclear stability in the region. We argue that both the Indian and Pakistani doctrines and postures are problematic from a regional security perspective because they are either ambiguous about how to address crucial deterrence related issues, and/or demonstrate a severe mismatch between the security problems and goals they are designed to deal with, and the doctrines that conceptualize and operationalize the role of nuclear weapons in grand strategy. Consequently, as both India's and Pakistan's nuclear doctrines and postures evolve, the risks of a spiralling nuclear arms race in the subcontinent are likely to increase without a reassessment of doctrinal issues in New Delhi and Islamabad. A case is made for more clarity and less ambition from both sides in reconceptualizing their nuclear doctrines. We conclude, however, that owing to the contrasting barriers to doctrinal reorientation in each country, the likelihood of such changes being made—and the ease with which they can be made—is greater in India than in Pakistan.","PeriodicalId":274998,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Other International Relations Theory & Conflict (Topic)","volume":"32 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"118959660","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 12