The Constitution of Czechia最新文献

The Judicial Branch 司法部门

The Constitution of Czechia Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5040/9781509920563.ch-007

A. Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, Reagan Clarence Thomas, Ghw Bush, Ruth Bader, Stephen Breyer, Clinton Samuel Alito, GW Bush, Sonia Sotomayor, George W. Bush

引用次数: 0

Local Governance 地方治理

The Constitution of Czechia Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.4135/9781446214817.n25

Graham Sansom

引用次数: 55

The Rise of Czech Constitutionalism: History and Context 捷克宪政的兴起:历史与语境

The Constitution of Czechia Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5040/9781509920563.ch-001

引用次数: 0

The Czech Parliament 捷克议会

The Constitution of Czechia Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5040/9781509920563.ch-004

引用次数: 0

Human Rights Constitutionalism 人权宪政

The Constitution of Czechia Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5040/9781509920563.ch-008

引用次数: 0

Conclusion: Dynamics of Constitutional Change and the Search for Constitutional Identity 结语:宪法变迁的动力与对宪法认同的追寻

The Constitution of Czechia Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5040/9781509920563.0008

引用次数: 0

The Growing Tension within the Double-Headed Executive 双头行政当局内部日益紧张的局势

The Constitution of Czechia Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5040/9781509920563.ch-005

引用次数: 0

Constitutional Principles 宪法原则

The Constitution of Czechia Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5040/9781509920563.ch-003

David Lyons

{"title":"Constitutional Principles","authors":"David Lyons","doi":"10.5040/9781509920563.ch-003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509920563.ch-003","url":null,"abstract":"Principles that are not given by the constitutional text are sometimes attributed to the Constitution. This is done within Professor Balkin’s “framework originalism.”1 The question I wish to consider is how it may properly be done. How can it be shown that the Constitution is committed tacitly to a given principle? I shall discuss Balkin’s theory with that question in mind. Balkin presents framework originalism as a mean between mistaken extremes – between “conservative originalism,” which holds that constitutional meaning is completely settled, and “living constitutionalism,” which regards constitutional meaning as forever unsettled. Framework originalism holds, first, that the Constitution’s text should be understood in terms of its “semantic content.”2 I understand this to be the view that the meaning of the text is determined by the linguistic conventions that existed when the Constitution or an amendment was ratified. That would, at any rate, be the commonsensical, default position, which requires no justification. Any other approach to text meaning would require substantial justification. That, I take it, is the originalist aspect of Balkin’s theory. Framework originalism holds, second, that the Constitution provides a “plan” for developing a system of governance. This, too, is the default position. The Constitution provides for a Congress, a President, and a Supreme Court, whose respective authorities it outlines. But the Constitution does not generally tell Congress what laws to enact, how the President should enforce the law, or how the Supreme Court should adjudicate. So the Constitution leaves much to be done by those who are authorized under it to make and apply laws. That, I take it, is the framework aspect of Balkin’s theory. Framework originalism holds, third, that as the Constitution’s plan is mainly given in general terms, it frequently requires interpretation. Interpretations are provisional and might reasonably be changed. Changing circumstances may generate reasons for questioning a prevailing interpretation, and amendments call for a revised interpretation of the modified document. As framework originalism accepts facts like these, it is presented by Balkin as a kind of living originalism. That, too, seems right.","PeriodicalId":273198,"journal":{"name":"The Constitution of Czechia","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130676706","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Challenge of a Pluralist Constitution 多元宪法的挑战

The Constitution of Czechia Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5040/9781509920563.ch-002

引用次数: 0