{"title":"Asian Miracle, Asian Tiger, or Asian Myth? Financial Sector and Risk Assessment through FSAP Experience: Enhancing Bank Supervision in Thailand","authors":"John Taskinsoy","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3385337","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3385337","url":null,"abstract":"From free people to a unified Thai kingdom in the mid-14th century (Siam until 1939), and from that to Asian Tiger (or Dragon). Although Thailand saw Japanese’s brief invasion in 1941, it has never been colonized by a European power. Nevertheless, Thailand has witnessed repeated political turmoil and two military coups in this millennium alone; in 2006, Prime Minister THAKSIN Chinnawat was ousted, and in May 2014, YINGLAK was removed from office. When taking these disruptions into account, one can be easily convinced that Thailand’s economic performance amid unimaginable challenges is a remarkable story to tell. The Bank of Thailand as well as regulatory and supervisory authorities have played a pivotal role in achieving financial stability. In May/June, Thailand underwent the Financial System Stability Assessment (FSSA) as part of the Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP), the experience has been very positive. The results of stress tests indicate that the BOT’s fiscal, structural, and monetary reforms have strengthened the financial system significantly since the Asian crisis of the late 1990s. In spite of numerous signs of inflationary pressure worldwide, inflation in Thailand is still persistently subdued; however, as an exported dependent nation, Thailand’s economy is always susceptible to imported inflation. To insulate its economy from exogenous as well as cross-border shocks, the BOT along with national regulatory and supervisory agencies must focus on reforms and policies to reduce potential detriments of the boom-and-bust cycles. We caution the Thai government authorities to stand ready to respond because the factors that are supportive of the present low inflation could reverse any time without a warning in the near future.","PeriodicalId":269416,"journal":{"name":"ERN: East Asia & Pacific (Sub-Topic)","volume":"3 11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124005517","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A Close Look at the U.S. Steel Industry: Protective Tariffs and Their Effect on the Economies of East Asia","authors":"Robert W. McGee, Yeomin Yoon","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2858439","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2858439","url":null,"abstract":"The U.S. steel industry has a long history of being protected, first when it was an infant industry in 1791 and later as it became a mature industry and needed breathing room to allow it to restructure so that it could compete against more efficient foreign producers. In recent years the steel industry has resorted to antidumping laws to ward off foreign competition. In the first quarter of 2002, President Bush imposed tariffs of up to 30 percent on foreign steel producers in many countries, including those in East Asia. This tariff, which was the result of a finding that some foreign steel companies had dumped their steel on the American market, may be the first shot in what might become a trade war. A number of countries have filed protests with the WTO seeking compensation for the tariff and some countries have already taken retaliatory measures. These recent trade actions have a ripple effect throughout the East Asian countries, including Korea, and the world. For example, if the United States market becomes closed to the steel companies in the EU, those steel companies will have to try to sell more steel within the EU at a time when Chinese, Korean and Japanese steel companies will also be trying to penetrate the EU market to make up for lost American sales. This paper will explore some of these issues, with an emphasis on the effects that steel protectionism in the United States will have on their industries and their economies. A different version of this paper was first published in 2002 and was reprinted in 2009. The present version includes a bibliography on trade, including links to more than 100 studies on trade.","PeriodicalId":269416,"journal":{"name":"ERN: East Asia & Pacific (Sub-Topic)","volume":"651 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116093026","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Economic Reforms in China and India: Past and Future Challenges","authors":"A. Borin, Enrica Di Stefano","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2845355","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2845355","url":null,"abstract":"In China and India broad economic reforms since the 1980s progressively opened to private initiative and international trade and were key contributors to their formidable growth patterns. Today, the positive effects of past liberalizations are fading and the two countries have reached a level of development and complexity that requires a “new generation” of reforms, qualitatively more complex and politically less palatable. This paper identifies the turning points in China’s and India’s long phases of fast growth. It then turns to the open issues that need government action to support a sustainable and lasting growth process. In China, the priorities are to foster new growth engines by boosting domestic consumption and improving quality and efficiency on the supply side. In India, the reforms proposed by the government aim at facilitating investment, fostering innovation, protecting intellectual property, and building top-class manufacturing infrastructure. Broad reforms of financial and labor markets are also on the agenda. To make progress in these reforms both countries will require overcoming the resistance of vested interests and short term implementation costs.","PeriodicalId":269416,"journal":{"name":"ERN: East Asia & Pacific (Sub-Topic)","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122019782","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}