V-Dem Institute Working Paper Series最新文献

A Framework for Understanding Regime Transformation: Introducing the ERT Dataset 一个理解制度转换的框架:引入ERT数据集

V-Dem Institute Working Paper Series Pub Date : 2021-02-01 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3781485

Seraphine F. Maerz, Amanda B. Edgell, M. Wilson, S. Hellmeier, S. Lindberg

引用次数: 14

Democracy Doesn’t Always Happen Over Night: Regime Change in Stages and Economic Growth 民主并不总是在一夜之间发生:政权更迭的阶段和经济增长

V-Dem Institute Working Paper Series Pub Date : 2021-02-01 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3786755

V. Boese, M. Eberhardt

引用次数: 6

Civil Society and Post-Independence Democracy Levels 公民社会和独立后的民主水平

V-Dem Institute Working Paper Series Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3519220

Sandra Grahn, Anna Lührmann

引用次数: 0

Rethinking Consensus vs. Majoritarian Democracy 重新思考共识vs.多数民主

V-Dem Institute Working Paper Series Pub Date : 2018-10-01 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3271512

M. Coppedge

引用次数: 2

Keeping the Democratic Façade: Contemporary Autocratization as a Game of Deception 保持民主的假象:当代专制作为欺骗的游戏

V-Dem Institute Working Paper Series Pub Date : 2018-08-01 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3236601

Anna Lührmann, S. Lindberg

引用次数: 12

V-Dem Annual Democracy Report 2018. Democracy for All? 《2018年度民主报告》。全民民主?

V-Dem Institute Working Paper Series Pub Date : 2018-05-01 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.3345071

Anna Lührmann, Sirianne Dahlum, S. Lindberg, Laura Maxwell, Valeriya Mechkova, Moa Olin, Shreeya Pillai, Constanza Sanhueza Petrarca, R. Sigman, N. Stepanova

引用次数: 20

Are Carbon Dioxide Emissions Decoupled from GDP Growth in Well-Functioning Democracies? 在运转良好的民主国家，二氧化碳排放与GDP增长脱钩了吗?

V-Dem Institute Working Paper Series Pub Date : 2017-12-01 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3082310

Ole Martin Lægreid, Marina Povitkina

{"title":"Are Carbon Dioxide Emissions Decoupled from GDP Growth in Well-Functioning Democracies?","authors":"Ole Martin Lægreid, Marina Povitkina","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3082310","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3082310","url":null,"abstract":"Empirical studies of the relationship between GDP per capita and country-level CO2 emissions tend to focus on the direct effect of per capita GDP growth, rarely taking political institutions into consideration. This paper introduces theoretical insights from environmental political science research, which suggests that CO2 emissions models would gain explanatory leverage if moderators gauging political institutions were considered. We test these theories by estimating the potentially moderating effects of democracy, corruption, veto points and players, and civil society activity. Our results suggest a positive and linear per capita GDP-CO2 relationship, which is barely affected by any variations in political and institutional factors. The only significant moderator in our analysis is bicameralism in democratic, low corrupt countries, which generates a stronger effect of per capita GDP growth at low levels of GDP per capita. Our analysis thus lends rigor to studies in environmental economics that find a positive and linear per capita GDP-CO2 relationship, and does not provide support for theories common in environmental political science research.","PeriodicalId":263028,"journal":{"name":"V-Dem Institute Working Paper Series","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128494571","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Eroding Regimes: What, Where, and When? 侵蚀政权:什么，何时何地?

V-Dem Institute Working Paper Series Pub Date : 2017-11-01 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3066677

M. Coppedge

引用次数: 39

State Capacity, Incumbent Turnover and Democratic Change in Authoritarian Elections 威权选举中的国家能力、现任者更替与民主变革

V-Dem Institute Working Paper Series Pub Date : 2017-06-01 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2986705

Carolien van Ham, Brigitte Seim

引用次数: 0

O Brasil Na Perspectiva Do Projeto Variedades Da Democracia (Perspective on Brazil By the Varieties of Democracy Project) 民主多样性项目对巴西的展望

V-Dem Institute Working Paper Series Pub Date : 2015-11-01 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.2691963

Fernando Bizzarro, M. Coppedge

{"title":"O Brasil Na Perspectiva Do Projeto Variedades Da Democracia (Perspective on Brazil By the Varieties of Democracy Project)","authors":"Fernando Bizzarro, M. Coppedge","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2691963","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2691963","url":null,"abstract":"Portuguese Abstract: Nesse artigo nos apresentamos resultados coletados pelo Projeto Variedades da Democracia para o Brasil. Nos descrevemos a evolucao historica da democracia brasileira entre 1900 e 2012 enfocando seus cinco principais componentes (eleitoral, liberal, participativo, deliberativo, e igualitario) e duas dimensoes adjacentes ao regime (corrupcao e partidos politicos). Por fim, nos comparamos os dados para o Brasil com resultados obtidos para outros paises da America do Sul. A analise dos dados aponta: a. a existencia de uma trajetoria “em espiral” dos regimes politicos no Brasil, na qual novas experiencias democraticas tendem a superar experiencias anteriores em todos os quesitos; b. os avancos e limites da experiencia democratica contemporânea em que se combinam bons resultados nos indicadores eleitoral, liberal e deliberativo da democracia, e resultados menos elevados nos componentes igualitario e participativo do regime, bem como em suas dimensoes adjacentes.English Abstract: In this article we present results for Brazil collected by the Varieties of Democracy project. We describe the historical evolution of democracy in Brazil from 1900 to 2012, focusing on its five main components (electoral, liberal, participatory, deliberative, and egalitarian), and on two adjacent dimensions of the regime (corruption and political parties). Lastly, we compare the data for Brazil with similar results for other South American countries. The results suggest: a. that a “spiral” trajectory has characterized Brazilian political regimes, in which new democratic experiences are always more democratic in all dimensions than previous ones; b. that the contemporary democratic experience combines positive results obtained in the electoral, liberal, and deliberative components of democracy, with less positive results observed in the egalitarian, and participatory components of democracy, as well as in its adjacent dimensions.","PeriodicalId":263028,"journal":{"name":"V-Dem Institute Working Paper Series","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133489286","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0