Judging at the Interface最新文献

Foreword by Judge James Crawford 詹姆斯·克劳福德法官作序

Judging at the Interface Pub Date : 2021-02-18 DOI: 10.1017/9781108867108.001

引用次数: 0

Index 指数

Judging at the Interface Pub Date : 2021-02-18 DOI: 10.1017/9781108867108.016

引用次数: 0

Data Tables 数据表

Judging at the Interface Pub Date : 2021-02-18 DOI: 10.1017/9781108867108.014

引用次数: 0

Concurrent Decision-Making Authority: Deference as Restraint, Reference, and Respect 并行决策权:服从作为约束、参考和尊重

Judging at the Interface Pub Date : 2021-02-18 DOI: 10.1017/9781108867108.009

引用次数: 0

The Systemic Implications of Deference in International Adjudication 国际裁判中服从的系统含义

Judging at the Interface Pub Date : 2021-02-18 DOI: 10.1017/9781108867108.011

引用次数: 0

Deference in Different Times and Contexts 不同时代和背景下的尊重

Judging at the Interface Pub Date : 2021-02-18 DOI: 10.1017/9781108867108.010

引用次数: 0

Defining Deference: The Connection between Deference and Authority 定义服从:服从与权威之间的联系

Judging at the Interface Pub Date : 2021-02-01 DOI: 10.1017/9781108867108.003

Esmé Shirlow

引用次数: 0

Deference and the International Adjudication of Private Property Disputes 尊重与私有财产纠纷的国际裁决

Judging at the Interface Pub Date : 2021-02-01 DOI: 10.1017/9781108867108.002

Esmé Shirlow

{"title":"Deference and the International Adjudication of Private Property Disputes","authors":"Esmé Shirlow","doi":"10.1017/9781108867108.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108867108.002","url":null,"abstract":"While working as a government lawyer in 2011, my team received a letter advising that the Philip Morris tobacco company had decided to sue Australia under a bilateral investment treaty. The company contended that Australia’s tobacco plain packaging requirements breached its intellectual property rights, entitling it to billions of dollars in compensation under international law. This news was not particularly shocking to the small team of which I was part, which had been assembled within the government’s Office of International Law to respond to these types of claim. The news was shocking, however, to the wider Australian public. Over the ensuing months, public disbelief became better-articulated in the press: how can an international tribunal sit in judgment over a measure that the Australian parliament had decided was in the public interest after extensive scientific enquiry and public consultation? Could an international tribunal really reverse the finding of Australia’s highest court that the legislation was lawful? These concerns about the appropriate reach of international law and about the appropriate relationship between international adjudicators and domestic decision-makers are longstanding. In 1927, for example, an Australian professor, William Sutton Cumbrae-Stewart KC, contended that: ‘[T]he League of Nations is doomed to failure if it attempts too much in the way of being busy about other people’s business.’ Some thirty-five years later, an American professor, Richard A. Falk, echoed this sentiment, observing that: ‘[I]nternational law, in contrast to domestic law, is much like a Victorian lady and must depend upon an excess of self-restraint to achieve virtue.’ Such concerns have gained traction in recent years as the expansion of international law has prompted qualitatively different and quantitatively increased opportunities","PeriodicalId":261150,"journal":{"name":"Judging at the Interface","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121581977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0