Talking International Law最新文献

Why Use the Language of the Law in Global Politics? On the Legitimacy Effects of Claiming to Act Legally 为什么在全球政治中使用法律语言?论主张合法行为的合法性效果

Talking International Law Pub Date : 2021-11-22 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197588437.003.0002

I. Venzke

{"title":"Why Use the Language of the Law in Global Politics? On the Legitimacy Effects of Claiming to Act Legally","authors":"I. Venzke","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197588437.003.0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197588437.003.0002","url":null,"abstract":"Why do actors use the language of international law in global politics? This chapter discusses answers to this question from the perspective of three different logics of action—consequentialism, appropriateness, and deference. It exposes how different explanations for the invocation of international law share assumptions about the law’s legitimacy effect, i.e., its impact on evaluative judgments about what is right and wrong. Typically: Do levels of approval decrease if a certain behavior is claimed to be illegal? This chapter discusses experimental studies that have inquired into the impact of invoking the law on public opinion, overall offering some support for the law’s legitimacy effect. But those studies are partially contradictory and require further refinement. The chapter argues that inquiries should pay closer regard to international law’s distinctive claim to authority, to the predispositions of non-US audiences, and to law’s function in enabling rather than constraining behavior. On this basis, the chapter makes suggestions for future experimental setups, closing with an outlook on the deep divides that have separated experimental methods from legal research of a more critical bent.","PeriodicalId":248745,"journal":{"name":"Talking International Law","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128731682","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Arguing about the Jus ad Bellum 争论战争法

Talking International Law Pub Date : 2021-11-22 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197588437.003.0003

Monica Hakimi

引用次数: 0

International Legal ArgumentationPractice in Need of a Theory 国际法律论辩的实践——理论的缺失

Talking International Law Pub Date : 2021-11-22 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197588437.003.0001

I. Johnstone, S. Ratner

引用次数: 0

Legal Argumentation in the Evolving Climate Regime 演变中的气候制度中的法律论证

Talking International Law Pub Date : 2021-11-22 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197588437.003.0012

Jutta Brunnée

引用次数: 0

Toward a Theory of Legal Argumentation 走向法律论证理论

Talking International Law Pub Date : 2021-11-22 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197588437.003.0017

I. Johnstone, S. Ratner

{"title":"Toward a Theory of Legal Argumentation","authors":"I. Johnstone, S. Ratner","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197588437.003.0017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197588437.003.0017","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter synthesizes some of the key insights from the book’s contributors as a first effort toward building a theory of international legal argumentation outside the courtroom. It deploys an inductive method for identifying common threads from the studies and poses questions for future theoretical work on nonjudicial legal argumentation. The chapter begins by demonstrating the diversity of understandings by participants and scholars on the meaning of a legal argument. It then turns to the motives for legal argumentation identified within the chapters, cataloging and situating them with respect to the venues of argumentation, the timing of argumentation, and the choice to abstain from legal argumentation. The analysis moves to consider the effects of argumentation, both those intended and not intended. Based on the findings in the chapters, it offers a set of possible factors accounting for the success of a legal argument. Two other considerations essential to any theories of argumentation—the density of the legal landscape and the perceived need for consistency in argumentation—are also addressed. The chapter concludes by suggesting research agendas so that the work of this volume can contribute to different theories of international law and relations.","PeriodicalId":248745,"journal":{"name":"Talking International Law","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132644631","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Mass Atrocity Crimes and Human Rights Discourse at the UN Security Council 联合国安理会的大规模暴行罪行和人权话语

Talking International Law Pub Date : 2021-11-22 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197588437.003.0008

Bruno Stagno-Ugarte

引用次数: 0

Argumentation in the UN Security CouncilInternational Law as Process 联合国安理会论辩:国际法作为一种进程

Talking International Law Pub Date : 2021-11-22 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197588437.003.0004

Scott P. Sheeran

引用次数: 0

Argumentation through LawAn Analysis of Decisions of the African Union 法律论证——非盟决策分析

Talking International Law Pub Date : 2021-11-22 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197588437.003.0010

W. Werner

引用次数: 0