发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Antonin Scalia and American Constitutionalism最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Icon 图标
Antonin Scalia and American Constitutionalism Pub Date : 2020-04-02 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197508763.003.0001
E. Purcell
{"title":"Icon","authors":"E. Purcell","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197508763.003.0001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197508763.003.0001","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter traces Justice Antonin Scalia’s rise from law school to a position on the Supreme Court and then his emergence as a judicial icon representing “conservatism” and “originalism” in opposition to the legacy of the Warren Court. It locates his rise in his political commitment to the Republican Party, his appeal to President Ronald Reagan and Attorney General Edwin Meese III, and his triumph over his fellow conservative intellectual Robert Bork for the leadership of judicial conservatism and the effort to promote constitutional originalism. Once established on the Court, Scalia’s influence grew until he and his jurisprudence became significant political issues for both national parties, especially in subsequent judicial confirmation hearings and presidential elections. When Scalia died in early 2016, his replacement became a major issue in the presidential campaign, and the new Trump administration promised to replace him with the most Scalia-like candidate it could find.","PeriodicalId":240049,"journal":{"name":"Antonin Scalia and American Constitutionalism","volume":"160 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124492152","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Theorist 理论家
Antonin Scalia and American Constitutionalism Pub Date : 2020-04-02 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197508763.003.0002
E. Purcell
{"title":"Theorist","authors":"E. Purcell","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197508763.003.0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197508763.003.0002","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter discusses Justice Antonin Scalia’s jurisprudence and his advocacy of what he called “public meaning” originalism in contrast to Robert Bork’s “original intent” originalism. The U.S. Constitution was properly construed, Scalia maintained, only by focusing on the text of the document itself and, where necessary, on the public writings of the Founders and well-established national “traditions.” Scalia rejected all other interpretive theories and lumped them together as “nonoriginalist” types of subjective and antidemocratic theories of “living” constitutionalism. This chapter examines the elements and assumptions behind his jurisprudence and offers a severe critique of both. It summarizes and draws on an extensive literature undermining the claims of his constitutional “originalism and concludes that his jurisprudential ideas were deeply flawed for a variety of reasons.","PeriodicalId":240049,"journal":{"name":"Antonin Scalia and American Constitutionalism","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129238680","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：604180095
Book学术官方微信