HEN: Risk-Adjustment & Case-Mix (Topic)最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Collective risk assessment in Affordable Care Act markets: A Bayesian hierarchical model 《平价医疗法案》市场的集体风险评估:贝叶斯层次模型
HEN: Risk-Adjustment & Case-Mix (Topic) Pub Date : 2020-09-06 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3659528
Juan Ignacio de Oyarbide, Rui Paulo
{"title":"Collective risk assessment in Affordable Care Act markets: A Bayesian hierarchical model","authors":"Juan Ignacio de Oyarbide, Rui Paulo","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3659528","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3659528","url":null,"abstract":"The changes that the Affordable Care Act introduced to the US health insurance market have entirely altered the traditional ratemaking process. Precisely, the creation of statewide community rating schemes and a guaranteed issue has facilitated insurance coverage to the high-risk population, leading to massive changes in risk pool compositions. The implementation of Risk Adjustment has neutralized some of the consequences of limiting premium variation in the market. However, setting appropriate rate levels has remained cumbersome due to the uncertainty about the statewide risk pool. Many insurers, who could not quantify the health risk associated with the statewide yearly enrollment, had to face unexpectedly high payments on risk equalization. Natsis (2019) stated that in this environment, the use of traditional univariate techniques to project statewide health care costs could be potentially misleading. This thesis proposes a Bayesian approach to reflect important sources of uncertainty over statewide actuarial estimates. The aggregate loss is modeled with a novel collective risk model based on a Generalized Beta Prime (GBP) distribution, accounting for long tail risks and changes in risk pool compositions. The GBP is presented with a mean-dispersion parametrization, which allows the introduction of a hierarchical prior specification over the state-specific means. This parameter structure, responsible of quantifying uncertainty and sharing information among states, is a cornerstone of the adopted collective risk model. Using the Commercial Health Care data extract published by the Society of Actuaries (2019), the model is applied on the Surgical and Transplant service category. The resulting heavy-tailed posteriors of the nationwide service means illustrate the high variation of inpatient medical costs. Moreover, the posteriors of the statewide aggregate claims remain highly right-skewed, reflecting the risk of facing sicker populations and high-cost treatments at individual claim level.","PeriodicalId":220305,"journal":{"name":"HEN: Risk-Adjustment & Case-Mix (Topic)","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131629517","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risk and Contract Design in Public Private Partnerships. 公私伙伴关系中的风险与合同设计。
HEN: Risk-Adjustment & Case-Mix (Topic) Pub Date : 2014-06-09 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2447519
K. Gopalan
{"title":"Risk and Contract Design in Public Private Partnerships.","authors":"K. Gopalan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2447519","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2447519","url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the Risk Management and Contract Design aspects of Public Private Partnerships. Part I begins with the question: How is a public private partnership distinct from public-private interaction over history? From this question, it identifies risk allocation and risk sharing as a central feature of PPPs today. Part II attempts to see when PPPs to be used, as well as the potential advantages and disadvantages of PPPs. These lead us to the central part of the study. Part III examines Risk in four parts: a profile of risk in PPPs, risk categories, risk allocation principles & strategies, and some common mistakes. All risk management is manifested in the contract specifications. Part IV therefore focuses on Getting the Contract Right, from the structure as well as the key aspects of contract formulation. The paper draws on the PPP experience, drawn from the UK, Australia, Asia and India for illustrations. The paper ends with concluding remarks.","PeriodicalId":220305,"journal":{"name":"HEN: Risk-Adjustment & Case-Mix (Topic)","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124753153","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信