AARN: Language最新文献

{"title":"The Use Of Tag Questions with Male and Female Speakers of English and Serbian","authors":"Vladimir Ž. Jovanović, V. Pavlovic","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2967908","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2967908","url":null,"abstract":"The paper is a report on research meant to discover the extent to which the speakers of English and Serbian employ tag questions as communicative strategies for ensuring pragmatic agreement and increasing the tentativeness of a speech act regarding the role of gender therein. This small-scale contrastive research project, largely inspired and founded on the specificities of gendered discourse style as identified by R. Lakoff (1975, 2004), and later discussed by Holmes (1986), Romaine (2003), Talbot (2003), Eckert & McConnell-Ginet (2003) and others, is based on analyzing contextualized question-tagging sampled from a corpus of texts within the journalistic register. The corpus encompasses 100 interviews provided by English and Serbian male and female interviewees from on-line newspapers and magazines. The analysis also addresses such issues as how culturally-conditioned or gender-conditioned tag-question usage is, whether a fixed form of question tagging would be less productive a pattern than the variable form, etc.","PeriodicalId":220184,"journal":{"name":"AARN: Language","volume":"300 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121458655","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Una aproximación interdisciplinar del análisis crítico del discurso (ACD) al estudio de la historia (Approaching Critical Discourse Analysis CDA into the Study of History)","authors":"Jorge E. Benavides B.","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/hjzww","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/hjzww","url":null,"abstract":"<b>Spanish Abstract:</b> Este artículo tiene como objetivo introducir la consideración del nuevo campo del análisis crítico del discurso (ACD) como forma complementaria al estudio de la historia. Intenta abordar algunos conceptos interdisciplinares para la Incorporación de este enfoque investigativo de reciente desarrollo, con orígenes en la teoría crítica,la lingüística crítica y el análisis del discurso, al campo de la historia.Se presenta su característica central en la consideración del discurso como acontecimiento histórico, como expresión sociocultural condicionada por las estructuras sociales y de creencia de grupos de poder que dominan sobre otros, haciendo del discurso determinante del contexto social y, a la vez, transmisor de ideologías. Se presentan las prácticas sociales paralelamente a las prácticas discursivas, existiendo una relación dialéctica entre ambas. Las relaciones de poder, dominio, hegemonía y especialmente la ideología son las áreas de trabajo en las que se concentra el ACD y cuyo campo de acción implica el recurso interdisciplinario y ransdisciplinario en áreas como la sicología, la sociología, la economía, la política y la educación (entre otras) relacionándose con la historia para poder describir, interpretar y explicar, a través de los discursos (escritos y orales), las relaciones históricas entre el lenguaje y la sociedad. <b>English Abstract:</b> The objective of this article is to invite the reader to consider the new field of critical discourse analysis (CDA) as a complementary way to the study of history. It intends to approach several interdisciplinary concepts for the incorporation of critical discourse analysis, a relatively recent theoretical and practical approach of discourse analysis based on critical theory, critical linguistics and discourse analysis into history. It centers its focus on the consideration of discourse as an event, a socio-cultural expression conditioned by social structures and belief systems of groups of power acting upon others and conditioning the social context while being the transmitter of ideology. It presents social practices in parallel to discursive ones thereby creating a dialectal relationship between them. The relations of power, hegemony, dominance, and especially, ideology, are the main concerns of critical discourse analysis thereby making room for interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary joint efforts to research: psychology, sociology, politics, economics, and education, among a few others are related to history in order to describe, interpret and explain the historical relationships between society and language.","PeriodicalId":220184,"journal":{"name":"AARN: Language","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133198816","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}