Topic: Assurance最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Communication Is a Two-way Street: Analyzing Approaches Undertaken to Systematically Transfer Audit Research Knowledge to Policymakers 沟通是双向的:分析向决策者系统传递审计研究知识的方法
Topic: Assurance Pub Date : 2020-03-23 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3224709
Steven E. Salterio, Kris Hoang, Yi Luo
{"title":"Communication Is a Two-way Street: Analyzing Approaches Undertaken to Systematically Transfer Audit Research Knowledge to Policymakers","authors":"Steven E. Salterio, Kris Hoang, Yi Luo","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3224709","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3224709","url":null,"abstract":"Audit academics and policymakers exhibit continuing concerns about the limited transfer of audit research findings to policymakers. We use knowledge transfer best practices to evaluate eight audit domain specific practices for their potential to transfer audit knowledge. Our analysis shows that while several less formal audit practices can contribute to knowledge transfer, the literature reviews produced under the PCAOB-AAA Auditing Section “research synthesis project” (RSP) are the practice that incorporates relatively more such best practice norms. We corroborate our documentary analysis of the RSP practice with RSP author interviews. We find that RSP authors anchored on the traditional academic literature review model to achieve their goal of knowledge transfer to policymakers but insufficiently adjusted that model to make it effective for that purpose. Despite the departures from best practices, we investigate the RSP reviews to determine if some audit research knowledge transfer occurred. First, we examine whether the intended recipients of the RSP reviews’ knowledge transfer can use that knowledge. Employing thirteen RSP reviews, we find that early career accounting professionals can use the reviews’ research evidence to evaluate existing standards and to recommend standards’ changes. Second, we investigate whether standard setters made use of the RSP reviews in their decisions by analyzing the research citations in the PCAOB rule-making dockets. We find that the PCAOB dockets increasingly cited research over the RSP life. Based on the finding of some knowledge transfer due to the RSP reviews, we suggest that a best knowledge transfer practices research synthesis approach warrants further investigation.","PeriodicalId":215263,"journal":{"name":"Topic: Assurance","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128901940","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书