Andrés Gascón-Cuenca, Alejando Año-Ibiza, Marcos Diago-Sanz, Olga Lenzi, Lorena Mercader-Jiménez, María Dolores Núñez-Ávila, Paula Quintana-Nieto
{"title":"Present problems to the Right to Peaceful Public Assembly in Spain","authors":"Andrés Gascón-Cuenca, Alejando Año-Ibiza, Marcos Diago-Sanz, Olga Lenzi, Lorena Mercader-Jiménez, María Dolores Núñez-Ávila, Paula Quintana-Nieto","doi":"10.7203/CLINICAJURIDICA.15142","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7203/CLINICAJURIDICA.15142","url":null,"abstract":"he Public Safety Organic Act 4/2015, also known as Spanish \"gag law\", has been harshly criticized by both national and international experts, and several worldwide institutions, due to the fact that it may be considered contrary to human rights and fundamental freedoms. \u0000This report focuses on the identification of the standards of protection of the right to peaceful public assembly and the challenges this new regulation poses to it. Therefore, we will cover the following areas: \u0000On the one hand, we shall analyze the Spanish legal framework, that includes the following: \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Article 21 of the Spanish Constitution, which offers a special protection to the right to peaceful public assembly. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000The constitutional standards of protection. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000The problem of the definition of this right. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000The case-law of the Constitutional Court, in order to identify the standards of \u0000protection set by it. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Articles 513 and 557 of the Criminal Code. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000The Private Security Services Act, as it regulates some aspects that may interfere \u0000with fundamental rights, as the one we are studying in this report. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Finally, we will analyze the regulation established by the new Public Safety Organic Act, entered into force in 2015, and also the Peaceful Public Assembly Regulatory \u0000Act. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000On the other hand, we will research into the international standards of protection of the right to peaceful public assembly, which are mainly settled in three international legal instruments: The Human Rights Council, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the European Convention on Humans Rights, and its case-law. \u0000Finally, we shall conclude this report with a critical approach to the new regulation established by the Public Safety Organic Act, as we consider it precludes the standards of protection we will identify throughout the report.","PeriodicalId":210492,"journal":{"name":"Clínica Jurídica per la Justícia Social. Informes","volume":"173 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115879042","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Andrés Gascón-Cuenca, Ana de Sousa Selfa, Victorino Domingos, Christian Fernando Proaño Guzman, Andrea Granda Iñiguez
{"title":"La discriminación en el acceso a la federación deportiva de las personas que viven o conviven con VIH en el ámbito de la Comunitat Valenciana","authors":"Andrés Gascón-Cuenca, Ana de Sousa Selfa, Victorino Domingos, Christian Fernando Proaño Guzman, Andrea Granda Iñiguez","doi":"10.7203/CLINICAJURIDICA.15141","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7203/CLINICAJURIDICA.15141","url":null,"abstract":"El presente informe ha sido realizado por un grupo de estudiantes del Máster en Derechos Humanos, Democracia y Justicia Internacional pertenecientes a la Clínica Jurídica per la Justícia Social de la Facultat de Dret de la Universitat de València. El mismo tiene por objeto la realización de una investigación de carácter jurídico-social respecto a la posible situación de discriminación que pueden estar afectando a las personas que viven o conviven con VIH dentro del ámbito deportivo. Concretamente, este estudio se centra en los requisitos establecidos por las federaciones deportivas ubicadas en el ámbito territorial de la Comunitat Valenciana para acceder al deporte profesional o federado. \u0000La realización de esta investigación se estructurará de la siguiente manera. En primer lugar, se realizará una breve referencia a la razón que motiva el informe, es decir, a la necesidad detectada que nos indujo a efectuar esta investigación. En segundo lugar, se valorará desde el punto de vista constitucional el razonamiento argumentado para la realización de pruebas serológicas de VIH respecto al acceso a la federación deportiva, revisando desde el criterio de la proporcionalidad si sería constitucionalmente aceptable que las personas que conviven con VIH tengan la obligación de presentar un examen serológico de VIH para acceder al carácter de federado, o si al contrario, esto supone una vulneración de derechos fundamentales. En tercer lugar, nos referiremos de forma breve a la normativa internacional y nacional concerniente a la cuestión investigada, en cuanto a la regulación del proceso de federación deportiva y al tratamiento de datos de carácter personal, de igual manera, a lo pertinente en cuanto a la legislación relativa en materia de igualdad, dignidad y no discriminación. Posteriormente, se expondrán de forma clara y sintética los datos y resultados obtenidos del estudio de campo realizado en el período de elaboración del presente informe1, el cual ha consistido en contactar a la totalidad de federaciones deportivas de la Comunitat Valenciana, con el objetivo de solicitar información concerniente a los requisitos exigidos a las personas que deseen federarse. De esta manera, nos ha sido posible conseguir una visión clara del estado de la cuestión dentro de este ámbito territorial y obtener un conocimiento tanto a nivel cuantitativo como cualitativo de las federaciones que solicitan exámenes serológicos de VIH para que una persona pueda proceder a la federación. Por último, se presentará un apartado en el que se sinteticen las conclusiones alcanzadas.","PeriodicalId":210492,"journal":{"name":"Clínica Jurídica per la Justícia Social. Informes","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133245511","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
M. Roig, Andrés Gascón Cuenca, María Dalli Almiñana, Pierrette Dupont, Ana Calvo Sierra
{"title":"Indirect Discrimination and School Segregation of Roma Children in the Czech Republic","authors":"M. Roig, Andrés Gascón Cuenca, María Dalli Almiñana, Pierrette Dupont, Ana Calvo Sierra","doi":"10.7203/CLINICAJURIDICA.4612","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7203/CLINICAJURIDICA.4612","url":null,"abstract":"In DH v. Czech Republic (2007), the Czech government argued that Roma parents consented to the assignment of their children to ‘special’ schools. According to the government, parental consent undermined the claim that the disproportionate assignment of Roma children to inferior schools amounted to discrimination. The court rejected the argument, finding as a matter of law that parents could not choose to subject their children to discriminatory education, and as a matter of fact that the parents’ consent was not informed. Since the judgment, the Czech government continues to disproportionately assign Roma children to inferior schools, but it has revised the procedure they use to obtain parental consent for the assignment, and there are some indications that Roma parents indeed wish for their children to go to separate schooling from Czech children because they would be subjected to bullying and other intimidation in integrated schools. This memorandum examines circumstances in which the disparate impact of a government policy is said to result from choices made by the purported victims, and analyses of how courts have addressed the issue of agency and discrimination.","PeriodicalId":210492,"journal":{"name":"Clínica Jurídica per la Justícia Social. Informes","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130194199","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}