LSN: Other - Other Issues Involving the Sale of Goods or Services to Consumers (Sub-Topic)最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Health Care Quality Reporting: A Failed Form of Mandated Disclosure? 医疗质量报告:一种失败的强制披露形式?
K. Madison
{"title":"Health Care Quality Reporting: A Failed Form of Mandated Disclosure?","authors":"K. Madison","doi":"10.18060/3911.0018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18060/3911.0018","url":null,"abstract":"The recently published book by Professors Omri Ben-Shahar and Carl E. Schneider, More Than You Wanted to Know: The Failure of Mandated Disclosure, imparts valuable lessons and offers food for thought for \"disclosurites\" of all sorts. The book's sensible arguments and voluminous evidence cutting across a broad range of regulatory areas should lead readers to question the advisability of mandated disclosure as a regulatory strategy. At the same time, however, the broad sweep of their work constrains their ability to offer comprehensive assessments of the advisability of particular disclosure policies, leaving readers to wonder whether there are exceptions to the authors' general claim, and if so, what form they might take. In this essay, I explore the possibility that quality reporting might be just such an exception. While quality reporting suffers from many of the problems that Ben-Shahar and Schneider have identified, evidence suggests quality reporting can make a difference. But assessing the net impact of quality reporting is no easy task. The policy objectives underlying governmental quality reporting initiatives are significantly broader than the goal at the heart of Ben-Shahar's and Schneider's analysis, complicating efforts to assess the initiatives' success. The initiatives' costs are also challenging to evaluate, in part because they support not just public reporting, but also other benefit-producing activities. After discussing these and other complexities that highlight the limits of Ben-Shahar's and Schneider's analysis, the essay calls for the development of a framework that lays out key characteristics of disclosure mandates and the environments in which they operate, so that we can develop a better understanding of the characteristics associated with mandate success.","PeriodicalId":157691,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Other - Other Issues Involving the Sale of Goods or Services to Consumers (Sub-Topic)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134329471","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Canadian on a British Airplane – Compensation and Extraordinary Circumstances in Aviation Delays: British Airways as a Case Study 英国飞机上的加拿大人——航空延误的赔偿和特殊情况:以英国航空公司为例研究
N. Goltz, Michael Purves-Smith
{"title":"Canadian on a British Airplane – Compensation and Extraordinary Circumstances in Aviation Delays: British Airways as a Case Study","authors":"N. Goltz, Michael Purves-Smith","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2529430","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2529430","url":null,"abstract":"This article describes and analyzes a case study of flight delay and the rejection of compensation to the passenger under the argument of extraordinary circumstances. The article first describe the delay in British Airways flight from London to Amsterdam; the regulatory framework that governs compensation for aviation delay in the European Union and in Canada; and analyse the case study in light of the regulatory framework. Finally, the implications with respect to the regulatory agencies involved are considered and recommendation to improve the regulatory regime are offered.","PeriodicalId":157691,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Other - Other Issues Involving the Sale of Goods or Services to Consumers (Sub-Topic)","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116715824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Consumer Protection Policy for Franchisees of Failed Franchisors 失败加盟商的加盟商消费者保护政策
Jenny Buchan
{"title":"Consumer Protection Policy for Franchisees of Failed Franchisors","authors":"Jenny Buchan","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1333811","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1333811","url":null,"abstract":"Over time, society's needs and expectations have led to franchisees being recognised as a new category of consumer and, since 1998, as a 'business consumer' under section 51AC Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) (TPA). In Part I of this paper, consumer policy objectives are identified, particularly in so far as they relate to franchisor failure. Three specific areas of the TPA are briefly explored in Part II for their potential as avenues of redress for franchisees of failed franchisors. They are; section 51AC, in relation to unconscionable conduct, the Franchising Code of Conduct (enacted under section 51AE, TPA), and sections 69 to 74H in relation to warranties implied into contracts for purchase of goods or services.In Part III some of the 'elephants in the room are introduced. It is concluded that whilst rehabilitation rather than vilification now awaits failed business people, the consumer protection law is yet to respond to the needs and expectations of franchisees of failed franchisors.","PeriodicalId":157691,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Other - Other Issues Involving the Sale of Goods or Services to Consumers (Sub-Topic)","volume":"2019 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128638711","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信