R. Petrescu, R. Aversa, A. Apicella, T. Abu-lebdeh, F. Petrescu
{"title":"A New Hypothesis About the Nuclear Hydrogen Structure","authors":"R. Petrescu, R. Aversa, A. Apicella, T. Abu-lebdeh, F. Petrescu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3482167","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3482167","url":null,"abstract":"In other papers already presented on the structure and dimensions of elemental hydrogen, the elementary particle dynamics was taken into account in order to be able to determine the size of the hydrogen. This new work, one comes back with a new dynamic hypothesis designed to fundamentally change again the dynamic particle size due to the impulse influence of the particle. Until now it has been assumed that the impulse of an elementary particle is equal to the mass of the particle multiplied by its velocity, but in reality, the impulse definition is different, which is derived from the translational kinetic energy in a rapport of its velocity. This produces an additional condensation of matter in its elemental form.","PeriodicalId":152302,"journal":{"name":"EngRN: Nuclear Engineering (Topic)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128301235","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The 'Double Standard' of Nonproliferation: Regime Type and the U.S. Response to Nuclear Weapons Program","authors":"Alina Shymanska","doi":"10.7290/IJNS040101","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7290/IJNS040101","url":null,"abstract":"There is no doubt that the NPT regime is far from being equal for all states involved. As the predominant hegemonic power since WWII, the United States plays a major role in deciding the fates of non-great power proliferators. This article tries to find the logical explanation of the phenomenon whereby some nuclear proliferators are absolved regardless of their active accumulation of nuclear arsenals while others are labeled as “rogue states” and ordered to disarm. The article suggests that a particular proliferator’s political regime could affect the way in which its state is approached by the U.S., known for its loyalty to democratic values. To check this argument’s feasibility, the author analyzes and compares types of political regimes of proliferators—which refer to non-great powers that commenced their nuclear programs since 1964. The study also shows that alignment with the U.S. and presence or absence of hostility toward the West are also influential factors. Along with the proliferator’s political regime, these factors determine whether the country is necessarily absolved, required to disarm, or heavily punished.<br><br>The author finds that the U.S. tends to free democratic proliferators from charges, especially those aligned with the U.S., officially or unofficially. In most cases, the autocratic governments are coerced to give up their proliferation ambitions, though an alignment with the U.S. may work as an extenuating circumstance to render the punishment less harmful. The article aims to demonstrate that the U.S.’s tendency to coerce undemocratic de facto nuclear powers, while avoiding coercion against democratic partners, is not a mere “double standard” or bias, but rather, a part of the U.S.’s strategic policy.","PeriodicalId":152302,"journal":{"name":"EngRN: Nuclear Engineering (Topic)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127517947","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Ion Distribution Models for Defect Fluorite Zro 2 - AO 1.5 (A = Ln, Y) Solid Solutions: I. Relationship between Lattice Parameter and Composition","authors":"A. Bukaemskiy, V. Vinograd, P. Kowalski","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3614844","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3614844","url":null,"abstract":"The composition dependence of the lattice constant, a, in A<sub>x</sub>B<sub>1-x</sub>O<sub>2-0.5x</sub>V<sub>0.5x</sub>, fluorite-type solid solutions (B = Zr, A = {Nd-Yb, Y}, V = oxygen vacancy) is characterized by changes in slope at x ~ 1/3, which cannot be described by existing models. Moreover, over the range of 0.15 ≤ x ≤ 1/3 the <i>a</i> vs. <i>x</i> data on all systems can be fitted with a linear equation, <i>a</i> = <i>q</i> + <i>rx</i>, with the same intercept, <i>q</i>, however, over the range of 1/3 ≤ <i>x</i> ≤ 1/2 the data bifurcate requiring different intercepts for A={Nd-Gd] and for A={Dy-Yb,Y} systems, implying steeper slopes for the first group. An adequate description is achieved via close-packing models involving two anion species, O<sup>2-</sup> and V, and three combinations of cation species, namely <sup>8</sup>A, <sup>7</sup>B, <sup>8</sup>B (0 ≤ <i>x</i> ≤ 1/3), 7<sup>A</sup>, 8<sup>A</sup>, 7<sup>B</sup> (1/3 ≤ <i>x</i> ≤ 1/2) and 8<sup>A</sup>, 6<sup>B</sup>, 7<sup>B</sup> (1/3 ≤ <i>x</i> ≤ 1/2), that take into an account the constraint on the average coordination number, K(<i>x</i>), of K(<i>x</i>) = 8 - 2<i>x</i> and two additional short-range order (SRO) constrains referring to vacancy-vacancy avoidance and vacancy-to-Zr association. The consistent fit to <i>a</i> vs. <i>x</i> data with these models requires the effective size of the oxygen vacancy to be larger than the radius of the oxygen anion by ~11%. The latter observation seems to play an important role in the understanding of structure-property relationships in A<sub>x</sub>B<sub>1-x</sub>O<sub>2-0.5x</sub>V<sub>0.5x</sub> systems.","PeriodicalId":152302,"journal":{"name":"EngRN: Nuclear Engineering (Topic)","volume":"484 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132704356","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}