{"title":"Intraguild predation and cannibalism between two co-occurring ladybird species (Coccinella septempunctata and Menochilus sexmaculatus): A fight for supremacy","authors":"Monalisa Monalisa, Ahmad Pervez","doi":"10.18686/pas.v5i1.1781","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18686/pas.v5i1.1781","url":null,"abstract":"Coccinella septempunctata L. (C7) and Menochilus sexmaculatus (Fabricius) (Ms) are aphidophagous ladybirds (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), which dominates the ladybird fauna of Oriental region. Since these species co-occur and are highly predaceous on various aphids, it was hypothesized that in the scarcity or absence of aphids, i.e., extraguild prey, one ladybird species will start attacking and killing the other one, which will endanger their co-occurrence. Thus, we aim to determine, which ladybirds’ larvae will subdue the other; their attack rates (rate at which a superior individual attacks the inferior one), escape rates (rate at which an inferior individual escapes from the attack of superior one) and predation rates (rate at which a superior individual eats the inferior one) were investigated, as they indulged in cannibalism and intraguild predation. Larvae of C7 were slightly bigger and heavier than those of Ms, thereby they gained a slight competitive advantage. This enabled C7 a better attacker and an escapist when confronted with larvae of Ms in a predatory guild, which resulted in lesser larval mortality due to intraguild predation by Ms larvae. However, C7 successfully preyed upon the larvae of Ms. The highest rate of cannibalism and intraguild predation was executed by C7 which made it a potent cannibal and an intraguild predator. Despite being outplayed by C7, the inferior Ms larvae didn’t suffer much loss during the intraguild combat due to their armoured morphological features in the form of spines and rough texture. This is the reason why Ms still exists as the second most commonly occurring ladybird in the field.","PeriodicalId":148033,"journal":{"name":"Probe - Animal Science","volume":"52 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139155174","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Conservation status of Bengal tiger Panthera tigris tigris in the earth’s only mangrove tigerland: A review of efforts and challenges","authors":"Jayanta Kumar Mallick","doi":"10.18686/pas.v5i1.1777","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18686/pas.v5i1.1777","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sundarban is the earth’s largest contiguous ‘mangrove forest’ (‘Bādābān’) designated as protected or conservation areas including biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, core area, critical tiger habitat, primitive (wilderness) zone, national park, wildlife sanctuaries, buffer area and reserved forests, covering 10,277 km<sup>2</sup> forest area [4260 km<sup>2</sup> (41.45%) in India and 6017 km<sup>2</sup> (58.55%) in Bangladesh]. This natural biodiversity hotspot is the only mangrove tigerland and the ‘last stronghold’ of <em>Panthera tigris tigris</em> with a camera trap-based population estimate of 214 (100 in Indian Sundarbans and 114 in Bangladesh Sundarbans) supported by a creek (sign) survey. Globally, Sundarban is a prioritised class I tiger conservation landscape extending over 5304 km<sup>2</sup> or 51.6% of total terrestrial and aquatic mangrove habitat in the region, which is facing emergent conservation challenges due to natural and anthropogenic threats. Several conservation actions have been executed to stabilise and increase the tiger population. There is cause for ‘cautious future optimism’ since the trend of historically high rates of mangrove clearing and degradation has slowed down and tiger population in the Sundarban mangroves has slightly increased and remains stable during the last three enumerations (2018–2022) in India (the results of the current camera-based census in Bangladesh counterpart are to be announced on 29 July 2024), which can be attributed to some positive improvements of tiger habitat management.</p>","PeriodicalId":148033,"journal":{"name":"Probe - Animal Science","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136060910","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"On Greta Gaard’s critical ecofeminist animal research","authors":"Yaxue Wang, Qian Zhao","doi":"10.18686/pas.v5i1.1780","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18686/pas.v5i1.1780","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The term “women” in ecofeminism goes far beyond its own scope and has a wide range of references: women, animals, plants, nature, people of color, grassroots people at the bottom of the ladder, and so on. As a famous contemporary ecofeminist scholar in the United States, Greta Gaard focuses her critical ecofeminism more on the criticism of sexism and speciesism, and she has been committed to animal research in ecofeminism. In her critical animal research, Gaard inherited the animal research of ecofeminists and advanced the research of critical ecofeminist animal study. She is not only highly concerned with the issue of animal oppression, but also proposes the theory of vegan ecofeminism and animal liberation, which are extensions and essence of Gaard’s critical animal research.<strong></strong></p>","PeriodicalId":148033,"journal":{"name":"Probe - Animal Science","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135490647","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A review and field verification of avian diversity and habitat use in the greater Sundarbans of India, Bangladesh and their hinterland","authors":"Jayanta Kumar Mallick","doi":"10.18686/pas.v5i1.1778","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18686/pas.v5i1.1778","url":null,"abstract":"The world-famous greater Sundarbans, the largest single block of tidal halophytic mangrove forest in the world and endangered ecosystem located in the Bengal delta, is now confined to 10,277 km2conservation areas in India (4260 km2) and Bangladesh (6017 km2) over 250 odd-islands, designated as the Natural World Heritage-cum-Ramsar Sites of ornithological importance. The Sundarbans is fringed by 11,936.26 km2 reclaimed agricultural fields/human settlements [‘Sundarbans Transition Zone’ (STZ), India and Ecologically Critical Areas (ECAs) plus Sundarbans Impact Zone (SIZ), Bangladesh]. This highly productive ecosystem provides diverse and abundant floral and faunal food resources, having high caloric concentrations, for the aves. A comprehensive study was conducted during 2019–2022 to bridge the knowledge-gaps of the avian diversity and habitat use through structural review of published and grey literature as well as field-based rapid assessment in the potential sites. 598 species, classified under 23 orders, 85 families and 277 genera, including seven extinct and about 40 old records, have been recorded in the study area. The terrestrial, arboreal and aquatic habitats are conveniently utilised by 32% resident and 68% migratory (summer and winter) birds for meeting their biological needs. 32.27% of them are commonly sighted and 67.73% rarely confronted. Considering the present biotic and abiotic threats, the rare birds are of high priority for future conservation actions.","PeriodicalId":148033,"journal":{"name":"Probe - Animal Science","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122866573","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}