{"title":"What Do You Understand of the Nature of Rural and Urban Society in the Light of Economy and Production in Sultanate Delhi?","authors":"Niti Deoliya","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2241587","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2241587","url":null,"abstract":"The establishment of Delhi Sultanate in the beginning of thirteenth century and its continued existence until early sixteenth century unfolded a gradual series of political, economic and social transformations and developments throughout the Indian sub-continent. The very presence of Sultanate was an intriguing journey of encounter of the two very different lifestyles, one being predominantly sedentary-agrarian indigenous population while the other Central Asian pastoral-nomadic. This paper is an attempt to unwind convoluted threads of economic and social interaction as a result of coming together of the two disparate backgrounds.","PeriodicalId":131473,"journal":{"name":"History of Rhetoric eJournal","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115339859","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Invectives in the Renaissance Scholarly Debates: Dialogue, Polemics, or Something Else?","authors":"M. Shumilin","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2172687","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2172687","url":null,"abstract":"Renaissance scholarly debates often look like personal invectives devoid of any real scientific content. The present paper examines this impression, considers several particular cases (Raffaele Reggio’s invectives against Johannes Calphurnius, Francesco Robortello’s polemics against Marc-Antoine Muret and Carlo Sigonio, Angelo Poliziano’s criticism of Domizio Calderini’s work) and proposes a more specified view on the problem.","PeriodicalId":131473,"journal":{"name":"History of Rhetoric eJournal","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127481464","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}