Climate Change Litigation in the Asia Pacific最新文献

Index 指数

Climate Change Litigation in the Asia Pacific Pub Date : 2020-10-29 DOI: 10.1017/9781108777810.017

引用次数: 0

Using Human Rights Law to Address the Impacts of Climate Change: Early Reflections on the Carbon Majors Inquiry 利用人权法解决气候变化的影响:对碳专业调查的早期反思

Climate Change Litigation in the Asia Pacific Pub Date : 2020-10-29 DOI: 10.1017/9781108777810.005

A. Savaresi, J. Hartmann

引用次数: 1

The Potential for UNCLOS Climate Change Litigation to Achieve Effective Mitigation Outcomes 《公约》气候变化诉讼实现有效缓解成果的潜力

Climate Change Litigation in the Asia Pacific Pub Date : 2020-10-29 DOI: 10.1017/9781108777810.007

Millicent McCreath

引用次数: 0

‘Next Generation’ Climate Change Litigation in Australia 澳大利亚的“下一代”气候变化诉讼

Climate Change Litigation in the Asia Pacific Pub Date : 2020-10-29 DOI: 10.1017/9781108777810.009

J. Peel, H. Osofsky, A. Foerster

引用次数: 1

Uncommon Law: Judging in the Anthropocene 非常规法:人类世的判断

Climate Change Litigation in the Asia Pacific Pub Date : 2020-07-13 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3650360

J. Galperin, Douglas A. Kysar

{"title":"Uncommon Law: Judging in the Anthropocene","authors":"J. Galperin, Douglas A. Kysar","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3650360","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3650360","url":null,"abstract":"The origin story of environmental law begins with judges working valiantly to protect the environment, but ultimately, out of an apparent necessity, passing responsibility to legislators and regulators. There is truth to the story, but it ignores important aspects of the demonstrated expertise, creativity, and dynamism of common law judges. Given the trajectory of the environmental law narrative, judges today too anxiously defer to legislative and regulatory policy, and we have come to expect, sometimes champion, this shirking of environmental responsibility. But this logic of deference is unpersuasive in an age where legislators and regulators also struggle, and most often fail, to address environmental issues like climate change. This chapter urges that, instead of minimizing the role of judges, there is immense need to rediscover the possibilities of common law environmental protection. There is need to write a new origin story in which courts, legislators, and regulators carry shared responsibility. The threat of climate change demands a turn to courts for a variety of services, not least, adjudication that uncovers individual suffering and declaration of norms of right and responsibility. The judge’s role in candidly attending to these meaningful decisions can be the catalyst for much needed political action.","PeriodicalId":130033,"journal":{"name":"Climate Change Litigation in the Asia Pacific","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134284739","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1