Intersections in International Cultural Heritage Law最新文献

筛选

英文中文

The World Heritage Convention and the Law of State ResponsibilityPromises and Pitfalls 世界遗产公约与国家责任法:承诺与陷阱

Intersections in International Cultural Heritage Law Pub Date : 2020-05-14 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198846291.003.0011

Lucas Lixinski, Vassilis P. Tzevelekos

{"title":"The World Heritage Convention and the Law of State ResponsibilityPromises and Pitfalls","authors":"Lucas Lixinski, Vassilis P. Tzevelekos","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198846291.003.0011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198846291.003.0011","url":null,"abstract":"Under many UNESCO instruments there is a disconnect between the language of the treaties and the mechanics of the positive law, on the one hand, and the actuality of international heritage management practice, on the other. Specifically, existing primary norms often do not set sufficiently clear legal obligations. This chapter explores this mismatch with a focus on (concurrent) State responsibility in the context of the World Heritage program. It focuses specifically on two different levels of State involvement in heritage protection: (1) multinational heritage nominations and (2) heritage that is listed by only one State, but that is also of interest to another State. The 1972 World Heritage Convention places heritage squarely within the territorial State’s sovereignty, even if it does recognize that States have a duty to cooperate in the protection of world heritage in other States as well. The duty of cooperation is seen as eroding State sovereignty, but critics also highlight that in fact there is too much sovereign control over those allegedly sovereignty-eroding dimensions of World Heritage processes.","PeriodicalId":122980,"journal":{"name":"Intersections in International Cultural Heritage Law","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125044328","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Bridging the Gap Between International Human Rights and International Cultural Heritage Law Instruments 缩小国际人权和国际文化遗产法律文书之间的差距

Intersections in International Cultural Heritage Law Pub Date : 2020-05-14 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198846291.003.0014

V. Tünsmeyer

引用次数: 0

Nationalism Versus Internationalism 民族主义与国际主义

Intersections in International Cultural Heritage Law Pub Date : 2020-05-14 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198846291.003.0016

R. Peters

{"title":"Nationalism Versus Internationalism","authors":"R. Peters","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198846291.003.0016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198846291.003.0016","url":null,"abstract":"Within the debate of nationalism versus internationalism, this chapter describes the development of international cultural heritage law, analyzes the notions and concepts used in this context, and highlights the existing shortcomings and loopholes in national and international legal frameworks in this field. First, the chapter explores the concept of a World Heritage Trust, and argues that the procedure used to designate World Heritage sites has become a national contest between States to obtain as many designations as possible, rather than the international and non-partisan procedure intended. Second, the chapter addresses the issue of trafficking in movable cultural heritage, by arguing that an exclusive focus on patrimony and national export laws (nationalism) is unidimensional and insufficient to protect movable cultural heritage from trafficking. In contrast, the mutual recognition of export laws through export and import regulations is a much more comprehensive and truly international approach (internationalism). In view of recent developments at the national level in Germany, as well as at EU level, the chapter demonstrates coordination between export and import regulations is necessary to protect cultural heritage against destruction and trafficking.","PeriodicalId":122980,"journal":{"name":"Intersections in International Cultural Heritage Law","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133821534","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2