发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Human Rights Unbound最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Extraterritoriality as a Matter of Interpretation 作为解释问题的治外法权
Human Rights Unbound Pub Date : 2020-06-11 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198863373.003.0002
Lea Raible
{"title":"Extraterritoriality as a Matter of Interpretation","authors":"Lea Raible","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198863373.003.0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198863373.003.0002","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter considers the standard view that extraterritoriality is a matter of treaty interpretation and that, following on from this, all that is required to discover the extraterritorial scope of human rights treaties is following the rules of interpretation set out in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. I argue that the extraterritorial scope of a treaty is a matter of treaty interpretation, but that it is not sufficient to follow rules in order to give meaning to international legal instruments. What determines the outcome of an interpretation is, in addition to these rules, a question of values. That is, what lies at the heart of interpretation is the determination of the values and principles that underlie a human rights treaty.","PeriodicalId":103082,"journal":{"name":"Human Rights Unbound","volume":"217 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115598568","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Conclusion 结论
Human Rights Unbound Pub Date : 2020-06-11 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198863373.003.0009
Lea Raible
{"title":"Conclusion","authors":"Lea Raible","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198863373.003.0009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198863373.003.0009","url":null,"abstract":"The conclusion revisits the central tenets and strands of the argument: how to understand interpretation, why jurisdiction is necessary, and how to account for it in international human rights law, how to relate it to territory, and how to apply jurisdiction as political power to a wide range of cases. It futher connects the theory of extraterritoriality developed in the previous chapters to wider considerations and takes stock of which questions have been answered and which questions remain. Finally, we consider why a narrow view of human rights might be our best option if we want to advance claims of global justice.","PeriodicalId":103082,"journal":{"name":"Human Rights Unbound","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115073969","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Title to Territory and JurisdictionThree and a Half Models 区域和管辖权的所有权三个半型号
Human Rights Unbound Pub Date : 2020-06-11 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198863373.003.0007
Lea Raible
{"title":"Title to Territory and JurisdictionThree and a Half Models","authors":"Lea Raible","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198863373.003.0007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198863373.003.0007","url":null,"abstract":"The very term ‘extraterritoriality’ implies that territory is significant. So far, however, my argument focuses on jurisdiction rather than territory. This chapter adds clarifications in this area. It examines the relationship of jurisdiction in international human rights law, whether understood as political power or not, and title to territory in international law. To this end, I start by looking at what international law has to say about jurisdiction as understood in international human rights law, and territory, respectively. The conclusion of the survey is that the two concepts serve different normative purposes, are underpinned by different values, and that they are thus not the same. Accordingly, an account of their relationship should be approached with conceptual care.","PeriodicalId":103082,"journal":{"name":"Human Rights Unbound","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115879333","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：604180095
Book学术官方微信