PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES最新文献_第4页

Reference change: an enduring puzzle 参考变化：一个持久的谜题

IF 1.3 1区哲学

PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2026-08-25 DOI: 10.1007/s11098-026-02530-0

Atheer Al-Khalfa

引用次数: 0

Correction: Against zero-grounding 纠正：反对零接地

IF 1.3 1区哲学

PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2026-08-24 DOI: 10.1007/s11098-026-02596-w

Tien-Chun Lo, Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra, Alexander Skiles

引用次数: 0

The place of ‘remembering’ in folk epistemology “记忆”在民间认识论中的地位

IF 1.3 1区哲学

PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2026-08-20 DOI: 10.1007/s11098-026-02598-8

Jakub Rudnicki

引用次数: 0

Is AI ethics about AI? AI伦理是关于AI的吗？

IF 1.3 1区哲学

PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2026-08-14 DOI: 10.1007/s11098-026-02533-x

Alexander Williams Tolbert

引用次数: 0

Fundamental principles: purity and neutrality 基本原则：纯洁和中立

IF 1.3 1区哲学

PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2026-08-11 DOI: 10.1007/s11098-026-02595-x

Jessica Leech

引用次数: 0

What’s unfair about resultant moral luck? 由此产生的道德运气有什么不公平的？

IF 1.3 1区哲学

PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2026-08-11 DOI: 10.1007/s11098-026-02591-1

Anna Nyman

引用次数: 0

Correction: Higher-order metaphysics of ground: introduction and overview 更正：高阶形而上学的基础：介绍和概述

IF 1.3 1区哲学

PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2026-08-03 DOI: 10.1007/s11098-026-02588-w

Lukas Skiba

引用次数: 0

Why soft-liners must be responsibility skeptics or bite the bullet 为什么温和派要么是责任怀疑论者，要么咬紧牙关

IF 1.3 1区哲学

PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2026-08-01 DOI: 10.1007/s11098-026-02594-y

Chris Cho

{"title":"Why soft-liners must be responsibility skeptics or bite the bullet","authors":"Chris Cho","doi":"10.1007/s11098-026-02594-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-026-02594-y","url":null,"abstract":"Soft-line compatibilism has come to occupy a privileged position in the debate over manipulation arguments against compatibilism. By identifying a responsibility-relevant difference between manipulated and ordinary agents, soft-liners promise to accommodate the intuition that manipulated agents are not responsible while preserving ordinary responsibility judgments. I argue that this promise cannot be kept. Soft-liners face a dilemma. On the one hand, if the conditions they identify as responsibility-undermining fully excuse manipulated agents, they commit themselves to a form of responsibility skepticism, since structurally similar forms of influence pervade ordinary agency as well. If, on the other hand, soft-liners maintain that manipulation merely mitigates rather than eliminates responsibility, they abandon the no responsibility intuition that motivates their view in the first place, and collapse into a hard-line position. Either way, soft-lining loses its dialectical advantage. The upshot is that the most promising compatibilist response to manipulation arguments must engage directly with the hard-line strategy, explaining why the no-responsibility intuition is ultimately to be resisted.","PeriodicalId":48305,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES","volume":"360 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148693325","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Think of the children: on the responsibility of children and other evolving agents 想想孩子：关于孩子的责任和其他不断发展的因素

IF 1.3 1区哲学

PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2026-07-24 DOI: 10.1007/s11098-026-02590-2

D. D. Brandenburg

{"title":"Think of the children: on the responsibility of children and other evolving agents","authors":"D. D. Brandenburg","doi":"10.1007/s11098-026-02590-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-026-02590-2","url":null,"abstract":"On the margins of normative competence, matters of responsibility become ambiguous. Can a 6-year-old be considered responsible for stealing? Is a 14-year-old blameworthy for plagiarizing on a test? Parents, educators, and philosophers provide different and seemingly conflicting answers to these types of questions. The ages at which children can be considered legally culpable also vary widely between democratic states. One reason for this is that, for evolving agents, it is difficult to assess whether they are insufficiently able to do what is expected of them, or whether they are able but unwilling to do what is expected of them. This gives rise to what I will refer to as a ‘can’t-or-won’t dilemma’. The two options are to either exculpate the person on the basis of insufficient ability, or to consider them responsible for wrongdoing. But neither option seems entirely satisfactory or appropriate in the light of uncertainty about a person’s level of normative competence. Recent alternative approaches to responsibility aim to address this problem by providing accounts of responsibility which do not rely on capacity criteria. On these accounts so called ‘marginal agents’ are in some way considered responsible for what they do. I discuss these solutions and argue that they do not resolve or dissolve the dilemma. Instead, their real contribution lies in how they can alleviate the dilemma. This insight helps move the debate forward, and has implications for how we think about adults too.","PeriodicalId":48305,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148587173","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Explanation grounds causation 解释依据因果关系

IF 1.3 1区哲学

PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2026-07-24 DOI: 10.1007/s11098-026-02515-z

Isaac Wilhelm

引用次数: 0