Culture, Practice & Europeanization最新文献_第7页

The political contestation of Europe: from integration to disintegration? 欧洲的政治争论:从一体化到解体?

Culture, Practice & Europeanization Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2018-2-59

H. Trenz

引用次数: 1

Social Security in Europe: Towards a Diachronic perspective for Analysing Social Policy Rescaling 欧洲的社会保障:从历时的角度分析社会政策调整

Culture, Practice & Europeanization Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2018-1-3

Stefanie Börner, Monika Eigmüller

{"title":"Social Security in Europe: Towards a Diachronic perspective for Analysing Social Policy Rescaling","authors":"Stefanie Börner, Monika Eigmüller","doi":"10.5771/2566-7742-2018-1-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2018-1-3","url":null,"abstract":"Recent debates often suggest that welfare states are nation states and that comprehensive social policies at the EU level are therefore inconceivable, given the lack of a European collective identity. Reconsidering former and current periods of social policy rescaling, this paper examines the preconditions for the expansion of the territorial frame of social policy organisation and asks when, why and how actors have been willing to change their frames of action on welfare policies. Adopting a diachronic perspective allows us to examine how processes of re-territorialisation can give rise to new categories of action and reference points which, in turn, establish new types of belonging and solidarity. To this end, we analyse actors’ interests, interpretations, motives and discursive shifts. Our findings point to a close intertwining between general structural changes in the economic and political spheres, on the one hand, and the shifting frames of reference and scope of action of the political, collective and individual actors involved, on the other. On the basis of these findings, we argue that structural transformations alter both political discourse and the actors’ own interests, which over the long run may lead to the emergence of new actors, ideas and territorial principles. Hence, instead of suggesting the rigid nature of national welfare states and, linked to this, the lack of solidarity at the European level, our historically informed approach sheds light on the creative and conflictive processes that led to the predominance of national social policies.","PeriodicalId":392823,"journal":{"name":"Culture, Practice & Europeanization","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121777305","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

Unpacking EU contestation: Europeanization and critique in Germany and Spain 拆解欧盟之争:德国与西班牙的欧洲化与批判

Culture, Practice & Europeanization Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2019-2-13

J. Roch

引用次数: 3

The double force of European categories: “Religion”, “language”, and “territory” as tools of domination and critique 欧洲范畴的双重力量:“宗教”、“语言”和“领土”作为统治和批判的工具

Culture, Practice & Europeanization Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2018-2-23

N. Tietze

引用次数: 0

Global pandemic, local solidarity: Six civic initiatives from Leipzig, Germany 全球流行病，地方团结:来自德国莱比锡的六项公民倡议

Culture, Practice & Europeanization Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2021-1-39

Micha Fiedlschuster, Leon Rosa Reichle

引用次数: 2

Andere, Selbste, Grenzen. Momentaufnahme eines Diskurses zur globalen Mirgration 同一种智慧当前掀起的全球性浪潮

Culture, Practice & Europeanization Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2016-1-16

Anne Sophie Krossa

引用次数: 1

Trade union politics as a countermovement? A Polaniyan perspective 工会政治作为一种反运动?波兰学派的观点

Culture, Practice & Europeanization Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2019-1-5

M. Seeliger

引用次数: 3

Brexit an exit disaster or entry into a Kafkaesque process? Reflections from a Danish education and research context 英国脱欧是一场退出灾难，还是进入了卡夫卡式的过程?丹麦教育和研究背景下的思考

Culture, Practice & Europeanization Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2017-1-4

John Benedicta Krejsler

引用次数: 0

A great variety of transformations – and populisms 各种各样的变革和民粹主义

Culture, Practice & Europeanization Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2019-1-92

Floris Biskamp

引用次数: 0

EU Freedoms at a Critical Juncture? The Positions of Member State Governments on EU Person and Services Mobility 欧盟自由正处于关键时刻?成员国政府对欧盟人员和服务流动的立场

Culture, Practice & Europeanization Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5771/2566-7742-2018-1-19

Christof Roos

{"title":"EU Freedoms at a Critical Juncture? The Positions of Member State Governments on EU Person and Services Mobility","authors":"Christof Roos","doi":"10.5771/2566-7742-2018-1-19","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5771/2566-7742-2018-1-19","url":null,"abstract":"Brexit has questioned the paradigm of ever expanding EU freedoms for persons and workers in the EU. Communitarian claims in favour of national sovereignty and social protectionism succeeded in mobilizing voters in the UK for leaving the EU. The study examines how liberal values underpinning the freedom of movement and freedom of services were contested by the governments of France, Germany, and the UK in the early 2010s. The findings of the comparison confirm that EU freedom rights are at a critical juncture. Policy change and underpinning normative claims of the governments of France and Germany suggest that the posting of workers is contested at its core, enabling competition of labour standards and wages in the single market. In contrast, freedom of movement and the right to equal treatment of EU citizens was only criticized at its margins, aiming at restrictions for access to specific benefits or unwanted groups. Regarding the UK, the analysis observes a reverse positioning: a rejection of equal treatment and affirmation of competition. Based on these findings it is argued that shifting support for the conditions for the posting of workers made recent communitarian corrections possible. However, continued support of the French and German government for the equal treatment of EU citizens underpinning the freedom of movement does not suggest radical changes to this freedom and key narrative for EU integration.","PeriodicalId":392823,"journal":{"name":"Culture, Practice & Europeanization","volume":"212 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124158815","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2