检查有和没有神经发育障碍的学龄前儿童的语用发展:一项横断面研究。

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Applied Neuropsychology: Child Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-19 DOI:10.1080/21622965.2023.2224483
Ahmed Alduais, Marinella Majorano, Tamara Bastianello
{"title":"检查有和没有神经发育障碍的学龄前儿童的语用发展:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Ahmed Alduais, Marinella Majorano, Tamara Bastianello","doi":"10.1080/21622965.2023.2224483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This cross-sectional study examined the relationship between gender, age, and pragmatic language development in <i>n</i> = 77 Italian preschool children (49-84 months) with and without neurodevelopmental disorders. The sample included 62 children without psychiatric history (<i>n</i> = 34 females, <i>n</i> = 27 males) and <i>n</i> = 15 children with psychiatric history (2 females, <i>n</i> = 13 males). Eight cases (<i>n</i> = 6 males, <i>n</i> = 2 females, 59-75 months) were matched for age and gender. The neurodevelopmental disorder group used the Targeted Observation of Pragmatics in Children's Conversations (TOPICC) tool. Pragmatic language skills were assessed with the Pragmatic Language Abilities (APL), Children's Communication Checklist-Version 2 (CCC-2), and TOPICC scales. Results showed no significant relationship between gender and pragmatic language development subscales, except for a marginally significant relationship with figurative metaphor scores. Age was positively correlated with verbal metaphor, metaphor, implied meaning, and overall pragmatic language skills, but not with figurative metaphor or situations scores. Paired samples t-tests and Wilcoxon tests compared matched groups, revealing significant differences between children with and without neurodevelopmental disorders on the TOPICC, APL, and CCC-2 tools. The findings highlight the importance of early identification and intervention for children with pragmatic language impairment (PLI) and the need for further research with larger samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":8047,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","volume":" ","pages":"29-45"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining pragmatic language development in preschoolers with and without neurodevelopmental disorders: A cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Alduais, Marinella Majorano, Tamara Bastianello\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21622965.2023.2224483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This cross-sectional study examined the relationship between gender, age, and pragmatic language development in <i>n</i> = 77 Italian preschool children (49-84 months) with and without neurodevelopmental disorders. The sample included 62 children without psychiatric history (<i>n</i> = 34 females, <i>n</i> = 27 males) and <i>n</i> = 15 children with psychiatric history (2 females, <i>n</i> = 13 males). Eight cases (<i>n</i> = 6 males, <i>n</i> = 2 females, 59-75 months) were matched for age and gender. The neurodevelopmental disorder group used the Targeted Observation of Pragmatics in Children's Conversations (TOPICC) tool. Pragmatic language skills were assessed with the Pragmatic Language Abilities (APL), Children's Communication Checklist-Version 2 (CCC-2), and TOPICC scales. Results showed no significant relationship between gender and pragmatic language development subscales, except for a marginally significant relationship with figurative metaphor scores. Age was positively correlated with verbal metaphor, metaphor, implied meaning, and overall pragmatic language skills, but not with figurative metaphor or situations scores. Paired samples t-tests and Wilcoxon tests compared matched groups, revealing significant differences between children with and without neurodevelopmental disorders on the TOPICC, APL, and CCC-2 tools. The findings highlight the importance of early identification and intervention for children with pragmatic language impairment (PLI) and the need for further research with larger samples.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Neuropsychology: Child\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"29-45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Neuropsychology: Child\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2023.2224483\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2023.2224483","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本横断面研究调查了n = 77名意大利学龄前儿童(49-84个月)有和没有神经发育障碍的性别、年龄和语用语言发展之间的关系。样本包括无精神病史儿童62例(女性34例,男性27例)和有精神病史儿童15例(女性2例,男性13例)。8例(男6例,女2例,年龄59 ~ 75月龄)进行年龄和性别匹配。神经发育障碍组使用儿童会话语用目标观察(TOPICC)工具。采用语用语言能力量表(APL)、儿童交际量表(CCC-2)和TOPICC量表对语用语言技能进行评估。结果显示,性别与语用语言发展量表之间没有显著的关系,除了与比喻隐喻得分有轻微的显著关系。年龄与言语隐喻、隐喻、隐含意义和整体语用技能呈正相关,但与比喻隐喻和情境得分无关。配对样本t检验和Wilcoxon检验比较了配对组,揭示了有和没有神经发育障碍的儿童在TOPICC、APL和cc -2工具上的显著差异。研究结果强调了早期识别和干预儿童语用障碍(PLI)的重要性,以及进一步研究更大样本的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examining pragmatic language development in preschoolers with and without neurodevelopmental disorders: A cross-sectional study.

This cross-sectional study examined the relationship between gender, age, and pragmatic language development in n = 77 Italian preschool children (49-84 months) with and without neurodevelopmental disorders. The sample included 62 children without psychiatric history (n = 34 females, n = 27 males) and n = 15 children with psychiatric history (2 females, n = 13 males). Eight cases (n = 6 males, n = 2 females, 59-75 months) were matched for age and gender. The neurodevelopmental disorder group used the Targeted Observation of Pragmatics in Children's Conversations (TOPICC) tool. Pragmatic language skills were assessed with the Pragmatic Language Abilities (APL), Children's Communication Checklist-Version 2 (CCC-2), and TOPICC scales. Results showed no significant relationship between gender and pragmatic language development subscales, except for a marginally significant relationship with figurative metaphor scores. Age was positively correlated with verbal metaphor, metaphor, implied meaning, and overall pragmatic language skills, but not with figurative metaphor or situations scores. Paired samples t-tests and Wilcoxon tests compared matched groups, revealing significant differences between children with and without neurodevelopmental disorders on the TOPICC, APL, and CCC-2 tools. The findings highlight the importance of early identification and intervention for children with pragmatic language impairment (PLI) and the need for further research with larger samples.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology: Child
Applied Neuropsychology: Child CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Applied Neuropsychology: Child publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in children. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of child patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信