{"title":"基于卷积神经网络迁移学习的高效净伪干电极EEG数据分类","authors":"M.N. van Stigt , E.A. Groenendijk , H.A. Marquering , J.M. Coutinho , W.V. Potters","doi":"10.1016/j.cnp.2023.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are promising for artifact detection in electroencephalography (EEG) data, but require large amounts of data. Despite increasing use of dry electrodes for EEG data acquisition, dry electrode EEG datasets are sparse. We aim to develop an algorithm for <em>clean</em> versus <em>artifact</em> dry electrode EEG data classification using transfer learning.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Dry electrode EEG data were acquired in 13 subjects while physiological and technical artifacts were induced. Data were per 2-second segment labeled as <em>clean</em> or <em>artifact</em> and split in an 80% train and 20% test set. With the train set, we fine-tuned a pre-trained CNN for <em>clean</em> versus <em>artifact</em> wet electrode EEG data classification using 3-fold cross validation. The three fine-tuned CNNs were combined in one final <em>clean</em> versus <em>artifact</em> classification algorithm, in which the majority vote was used for classification. We calculated accuracy, F1-score, precision, and recall of the pre-trained CNN and fine-tuned algorithm when applied to unseen test data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The algorithm was trained on 0.40 million and tested on 0.17 million overlapping EEG segments. The pre-trained CNN had a test accuracy of 65.6%. The fine-tuned <em>clean</em> versus <em>artifact</em> classification algorithm had an improved test accuracy of 90.7%, F1-score of 90.2%, precision of 89.1% and recall of 91.2%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Despite a relatively small dry electrode EEG dataset, transfer learning enabled development of a high performing CNN-based algorithm for <em>clean</em> versus <em>artifact</em> classification.</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>Development of CNNs for classification of dry electrode EEG data is challenging as dry electrode EEG datasets are sparse. Here, we show that transfer learning can be used to overcome this problem.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45697,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology Practice","volume":"8 ","pages":"Pages 88-91"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10196906/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High performance clean versus artifact dry electrode EEG data classification using Convolutional Neural Network transfer learning\",\"authors\":\"M.N. van Stigt , E.A. Groenendijk , H.A. Marquering , J.M. Coutinho , W.V. Potters\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cnp.2023.04.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are promising for artifact detection in electroencephalography (EEG) data, but require large amounts of data. Despite increasing use of dry electrodes for EEG data acquisition, dry electrode EEG datasets are sparse. We aim to develop an algorithm for <em>clean</em> versus <em>artifact</em> dry electrode EEG data classification using transfer learning.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Dry electrode EEG data were acquired in 13 subjects while physiological and technical artifacts were induced. Data were per 2-second segment labeled as <em>clean</em> or <em>artifact</em> and split in an 80% train and 20% test set. With the train set, we fine-tuned a pre-trained CNN for <em>clean</em> versus <em>artifact</em> wet electrode EEG data classification using 3-fold cross validation. The three fine-tuned CNNs were combined in one final <em>clean</em> versus <em>artifact</em> classification algorithm, in which the majority vote was used for classification. We calculated accuracy, F1-score, precision, and recall of the pre-trained CNN and fine-tuned algorithm when applied to unseen test data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The algorithm was trained on 0.40 million and tested on 0.17 million overlapping EEG segments. The pre-trained CNN had a test accuracy of 65.6%. The fine-tuned <em>clean</em> versus <em>artifact</em> classification algorithm had an improved test accuracy of 90.7%, F1-score of 90.2%, precision of 89.1% and recall of 91.2%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Despite a relatively small dry electrode EEG dataset, transfer learning enabled development of a high performing CNN-based algorithm for <em>clean</em> versus <em>artifact</em> classification.</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>Development of CNNs for classification of dry electrode EEG data is challenging as dry electrode EEG datasets are sparse. Here, we show that transfer learning can be used to overcome this problem.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neurophysiology Practice\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 88-91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10196906/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neurophysiology Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467981X23000094\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurophysiology Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467981X23000094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
High performance clean versus artifact dry electrode EEG data classification using Convolutional Neural Network transfer learning
Objective
Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are promising for artifact detection in electroencephalography (EEG) data, but require large amounts of data. Despite increasing use of dry electrodes for EEG data acquisition, dry electrode EEG datasets are sparse. We aim to develop an algorithm for clean versus artifact dry electrode EEG data classification using transfer learning.
Methods
Dry electrode EEG data were acquired in 13 subjects while physiological and technical artifacts were induced. Data were per 2-second segment labeled as clean or artifact and split in an 80% train and 20% test set. With the train set, we fine-tuned a pre-trained CNN for clean versus artifact wet electrode EEG data classification using 3-fold cross validation. The three fine-tuned CNNs were combined in one final clean versus artifact classification algorithm, in which the majority vote was used for classification. We calculated accuracy, F1-score, precision, and recall of the pre-trained CNN and fine-tuned algorithm when applied to unseen test data.
Results
The algorithm was trained on 0.40 million and tested on 0.17 million overlapping EEG segments. The pre-trained CNN had a test accuracy of 65.6%. The fine-tuned clean versus artifact classification algorithm had an improved test accuracy of 90.7%, F1-score of 90.2%, precision of 89.1% and recall of 91.2%.
Conclusions
Despite a relatively small dry electrode EEG dataset, transfer learning enabled development of a high performing CNN-based algorithm for clean versus artifact classification.
Significance
Development of CNNs for classification of dry electrode EEG data is challenging as dry electrode EEG datasets are sparse. Here, we show that transfer learning can be used to overcome this problem.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Neurophysiology Practice (CNP) is a new Open Access journal that focuses on clinical practice issues in clinical neurophysiology including relevant new research, case reports or clinical series, normal values and didactic reviews. It is an official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology and complements Clinical Neurophysiology which focuses on innovative research in the specialty. It has a role in supporting established clinical practice, and an educational role for trainees, technicians and practitioners.