难治性精神病患者的主观认知功能、抑郁症状和客观认知功能

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Daniah Zumrawi, Brianne L Glazier, Olga Leonova, Mahesh Menon, Ric Procyshyn, Randall White, Robert Stowe, William G Honer, Ivan J Torres
{"title":"难治性精神病患者的主观认知功能、抑郁症状和客观认知功能","authors":"Daniah Zumrawi,&nbsp;Brianne L Glazier,&nbsp;Olga Leonova,&nbsp;Mahesh Menon,&nbsp;Ric Procyshyn,&nbsp;Randall White,&nbsp;Robert Stowe,&nbsp;William G Honer,&nbsp;Ivan J Torres","doi":"10.1080/13546805.2022.2108389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Introduction:</i> Relationships between subjective cognitive functioning (SCF), objective cognitive functioning (OCF), and depressive symptoms are poorly understood in treatment-resistant psychosis (TRP). This study (a) compares SCF in TRP using positively and negatively worded scales, (b) assess these scales' accuracy, and (c) explores the association between these scales and depressive symptoms. We hypothesised that both SCF scales would be highly correlated, minimally associated with OCF, and similarly associated with depressive symptoms. <i>Methods:</i> Archival clinical data from 52 TRP inpatients was utilised. OCF composite scores were derived from a broad neuropsychological battery. SCF was assessed using the norm-referenced PROMIS 2.0 Cognitive Abilities (positively worded) and Concerns (negatively worded) subscales. A depressive symptom score was derived from the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. <i>Results:</i> SCF ratings were higher in patients than OCF. There was a small but significant correlation between PROMIS subscales (<i>r</i> = .30). Neither PROMIS subscale was associated with OCF (<i>r</i> = -.11, <i>r</i> = .01). Depressive symptoms were correlated with the positively (<i>r</i> = -.29) but not negatively worded scale (<i>r</i> = -.13). <i>Conclusion:</i> Individuals with TRP inaccurately rate their cognitive functioning and tend to overestimate their ability. Positively and negatively worded SCF scales associate variably with depressive symptoms, indicating they may not be used interchangeably in TRP.</p>","PeriodicalId":51277,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry","volume":"27 6","pages":"411-429"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subjective cognitive functioning, depressive symptoms, and objective cognitive functioning in people with treatment-resistant psychosis.\",\"authors\":\"Daniah Zumrawi,&nbsp;Brianne L Glazier,&nbsp;Olga Leonova,&nbsp;Mahesh Menon,&nbsp;Ric Procyshyn,&nbsp;Randall White,&nbsp;Robert Stowe,&nbsp;William G Honer,&nbsp;Ivan J Torres\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13546805.2022.2108389\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Introduction:</i> Relationships between subjective cognitive functioning (SCF), objective cognitive functioning (OCF), and depressive symptoms are poorly understood in treatment-resistant psychosis (TRP). This study (a) compares SCF in TRP using positively and negatively worded scales, (b) assess these scales' accuracy, and (c) explores the association between these scales and depressive symptoms. We hypothesised that both SCF scales would be highly correlated, minimally associated with OCF, and similarly associated with depressive symptoms. <i>Methods:</i> Archival clinical data from 52 TRP inpatients was utilised. OCF composite scores were derived from a broad neuropsychological battery. SCF was assessed using the norm-referenced PROMIS 2.0 Cognitive Abilities (positively worded) and Concerns (negatively worded) subscales. A depressive symptom score was derived from the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. <i>Results:</i> SCF ratings were higher in patients than OCF. There was a small but significant correlation between PROMIS subscales (<i>r</i> = .30). Neither PROMIS subscale was associated with OCF (<i>r</i> = -.11, <i>r</i> = .01). Depressive symptoms were correlated with the positively (<i>r</i> = -.29) but not negatively worded scale (<i>r</i> = -.13). <i>Conclusion:</i> Individuals with TRP inaccurately rate their cognitive functioning and tend to overestimate their ability. Positively and negatively worded SCF scales associate variably with depressive symptoms, indicating they may not be used interchangeably in TRP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry\",\"volume\":\"27 6\",\"pages\":\"411-429\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2022.2108389\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2022.2108389","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:在难治性精神病(TRP)中,主观认知功能(SCF)、客观认知功能(OCF)和抑郁症状之间的关系尚不清楚。本研究(a)使用积极和消极措辞量表比较TRP中的SCF, (b)评估这些量表的准确性,(c)探讨这些量表与抑郁症状之间的关系。我们假设两种SCF量表高度相关,与OCF的相关性最低,与抑郁症状的相关性相似。方法:利用52例TRP住院患者的临床资料。OCF综合评分来源于广泛的神经心理学电池。SCF采用标准参考的PROMIS 2.0认知能力(积极措辞)和关注(消极措辞)分量表进行评估。抑郁症状评分来自阳性和阴性综合征量表。结果:SCF评分高于OCF。PROMIS各分量表间存在较小但显著的相关性(r = 0.30)。PROMIS分量表与OCF均无相关性(r = -)。11, r = .01)。抑郁症状与量表呈正相关(r = - 0.29),但与量表无负相关(r = - 0.13)。结论:TRP患者对自己的认知功能评价不准确,容易高估自己的认知能力。积极和消极措辞的SCF量表与抑郁症状有不同的相关性,表明它们在TRP中不能互换使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Subjective cognitive functioning, depressive symptoms, and objective cognitive functioning in people with treatment-resistant psychosis.

Introduction: Relationships between subjective cognitive functioning (SCF), objective cognitive functioning (OCF), and depressive symptoms are poorly understood in treatment-resistant psychosis (TRP). This study (a) compares SCF in TRP using positively and negatively worded scales, (b) assess these scales' accuracy, and (c) explores the association between these scales and depressive symptoms. We hypothesised that both SCF scales would be highly correlated, minimally associated with OCF, and similarly associated with depressive symptoms. Methods: Archival clinical data from 52 TRP inpatients was utilised. OCF composite scores were derived from a broad neuropsychological battery. SCF was assessed using the norm-referenced PROMIS 2.0 Cognitive Abilities (positively worded) and Concerns (negatively worded) subscales. A depressive symptom score was derived from the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. Results: SCF ratings were higher in patients than OCF. There was a small but significant correlation between PROMIS subscales (r = .30). Neither PROMIS subscale was associated with OCF (r = -.11, r = .01). Depressive symptoms were correlated with the positively (r = -.29) but not negatively worded scale (r = -.13). Conclusion: Individuals with TRP inaccurately rate their cognitive functioning and tend to overestimate their ability. Positively and negatively worded SCF scales associate variably with depressive symptoms, indicating they may not be used interchangeably in TRP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive Neuropsychiatry (CNP) publishes high quality empirical and theoretical papers in the multi-disciplinary field of cognitive neuropsychiatry. Specifically the journal promotes the study of cognitive processes underlying psychological and behavioural abnormalities, including psychotic symptoms, with and without organic brain disease. Since 1996, CNP has published original papers, short reports, case studies and theoretical and empirical reviews in fields of clinical and cognitive neuropsychiatry, which have a bearing on the understanding of normal cognitive processes. Relevant research from cognitive neuroscience, cognitive neuropsychology and clinical populations will also be considered. There are no page charges and we are able to offer free color printing where color is necessary.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信