{"title":"反映类型和学生的意见反馈在第一年的工程课程使用标准为基础的评分","authors":"H. Diefes‐Dux, Laura M. Cruz Castro","doi":"10.1002/jee.20452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Feedback is one of the most powerful and essential tools for learning and assessment, particularly when it provides the information necessary to close an existing gap between actual and reference levels of performance. The literature on feedback has primarily focused on addressing strategies for providing effective feedback rather than aspects of students' readiness to engage with feedback.","PeriodicalId":38191,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Engineering Education","volume":"7 1","pages":"283 - 307"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reflection types and students' viewing of feedback in a first‐year engineering course using standards‐based grading\",\"authors\":\"H. Diefes‐Dux, Laura M. Cruz Castro\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jee.20452\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Feedback is one of the most powerful and essential tools for learning and assessment, particularly when it provides the information necessary to close an existing gap between actual and reference levels of performance. The literature on feedback has primarily focused on addressing strategies for providing effective feedback rather than aspects of students' readiness to engage with feedback.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Journal of Engineering Education\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"283 - 307\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Journal of Engineering Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20452\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reflection types and students' viewing of feedback in a first‐year engineering course using standards‐based grading
Feedback is one of the most powerful and essential tools for learning and assessment, particularly when it provides the information necessary to close an existing gap between actual and reference levels of performance. The literature on feedback has primarily focused on addressing strategies for providing effective feedback rather than aspects of students' readiness to engage with feedback.