{"title":"判别响应函数","authors":"S. J. Weiss","doi":"10.1080/15021149.2017.1390203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Mowrer identified two processes by which discriminative stimuli influence operant behavior. The discriminative-response process involves control of responding by antecedent stimuli. The incentive-motivational process is created by implicit Pavlovian pairing of these SDs with the reinforcer produced by the responding. Most studies in this area involve Pavlovian-instrumental transfer, which measures incentive-motivational effects of stimuli by presenting them on an ongoing of an SDs. Therefore, the discriminative-response process has been neglected. To remedy this, experiments directly manipulated the discriminative-response properties of tone and light SDs while their incentive-motive properties were held comparable. Over groups, the SDs produced an increase, no change, or a decrease in responding. When tone and light were then presented together for the first time in a stimulus-compounding test, response rates were determined by the discriminative-response process. This discriminative-response function is similar to an instrumentally-derived incentive-motivational function, also obtained solely with operant-schedule training. This shows that both processes influence resultant behavior comparably.","PeriodicalId":37052,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Behavior Analysis","volume":"68 1","pages":"195 - 211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The discriminative-response function\",\"authors\":\"S. J. Weiss\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15021149.2017.1390203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Mowrer identified two processes by which discriminative stimuli influence operant behavior. The discriminative-response process involves control of responding by antecedent stimuli. The incentive-motivational process is created by implicit Pavlovian pairing of these SDs with the reinforcer produced by the responding. Most studies in this area involve Pavlovian-instrumental transfer, which measures incentive-motivational effects of stimuli by presenting them on an ongoing of an SDs. Therefore, the discriminative-response process has been neglected. To remedy this, experiments directly manipulated the discriminative-response properties of tone and light SDs while their incentive-motive properties were held comparable. Over groups, the SDs produced an increase, no change, or a decrease in responding. When tone and light were then presented together for the first time in a stimulus-compounding test, response rates were determined by the discriminative-response process. This discriminative-response function is similar to an instrumentally-derived incentive-motivational function, also obtained solely with operant-schedule training. This shows that both processes influence resultant behavior comparably.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Behavior Analysis\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"195 - 211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Behavior Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2017.1390203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Behavior Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2017.1390203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
ABSTRACT Mowrer identified two processes by which discriminative stimuli influence operant behavior. The discriminative-response process involves control of responding by antecedent stimuli. The incentive-motivational process is created by implicit Pavlovian pairing of these SDs with the reinforcer produced by the responding. Most studies in this area involve Pavlovian-instrumental transfer, which measures incentive-motivational effects of stimuli by presenting them on an ongoing of an SDs. Therefore, the discriminative-response process has been neglected. To remedy this, experiments directly manipulated the discriminative-response properties of tone and light SDs while their incentive-motive properties were held comparable. Over groups, the SDs produced an increase, no change, or a decrease in responding. When tone and light were then presented together for the first time in a stimulus-compounding test, response rates were determined by the discriminative-response process. This discriminative-response function is similar to an instrumentally-derived incentive-motivational function, also obtained solely with operant-schedule training. This shows that both processes influence resultant behavior comparably.